.
. . giving credit where credit is due. The ivory tower
is not without its dungeon for those who ignore this ironclad
cardinal rule.
John
Sledge in "Plagiarism Charges Pull Prize-Winner
from Shelves." Mobile Register.
Plagiarism
in Academia--Students and Professors
One
can sort of understand the temptations today faced by students
as they grapple with the digital verbiage proliferating ad
infinitum on the Internet. "What's wrong with a
bit of cut-n-paste so long as I get this paper done on time?"
Or "How about those 'research services'? Great way to
get that paper done in a pinch, eh!?!
Essay-Mart.
"Always low prices. Always!"
With the "Wal-Martisation" of higher education,
shopping around for the best deals, the best prices--including
prices for ready made or made-to-order essays and termpapers--has
become the norm.
That's not to say that student plagiarism is any more justifiable
than plagiarism by other members of academia. Students are
certainly not to be excused for blatant plagiarism. But it
must be admitted that academia has been somewhat slow to catch
on to the academic charade which university education has
become for those students over the years who have used online
paper databases, and more recently, the "Research Services"
which have sprung up to counter the anti-plagiarism services
such as MyDropBox.com, Turnitin.com, EVE (Essay Verification
Engine), and Glatt Plagiarism services among others.
One
would expect the leaders in the academic enterprise to take
a bit more initiative in condemning academic dishonesty when
it happens among their own ranks. Things do seem to be improving
in this regard, but it's a great shame to the academic profession
when educators or researchers indulge in the same sort of
linguistic pilfering that their students are so often found
out for. Why would a member of academia choose to lift the
language of a source text and attempt to foist it off as his
own? Why would someone choose to take such a risk with their
academic career? Common sense just doesn't seem to offer an
answer as to why a college professor would decide to plagiarize--particularly
the work of the students he has been mentoring as happens
on occasion.
Within
this webspace devoted to academia, the famous cases of plagiarism
exclude some notable historians whose thefts have been disclosed
in recent years. There have been enough cases of plagiarism
by historians to warrant a listing of these offenders
in a space of their own! The academic cases below include
a number of student cases which made the headlines, some of
the more notable offenses by members of the academic elite
whose offenses generated some rather big ripples, and other
lesser plagiarists in academia whose offenses didn't make
a very big splash at all.
...
...
Profiles
in Plagiarism: Academia
________________________________________________________________________________
|
| George
O. Carney
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-1971-GOC |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
   
Orange: High Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Professor
of Geography, Oklahoma State University
|
| Allegations: |
Extensive
plagiarism spanning an entire academic career
|
| Results: |
Inconsequential
effects for most of his career, occasional discomfort
and rejection of texts tendered for publication, basically
forced into early retirement after publication of
plagiarism allegations by the Chronicle of Higher
Education
|
| Known
for: |
American
geography/musicology
|
| Overview: |
The
case of George O. Carney was discussed in The Chronicle
of Higher Education, and from this discussion,
it would appear that Professor Carney was a career plagiarist.
That is, from
the very start of his teaching and research as a professor
of geography, he employed cut-n-paste as a means of
textual composition. Papers, books, book chapters, essays--these
were composed using "phrases, sentences, and even
entire paragraphs from numerous authors" without
proper citation, according to the authors of the Chronicle
feature on plagiarism.
The only sort
of censure or condemnation that Professor Carney ever
encountered involves a few rejected manuscripts and
a promise by Oklahoma State to "look into the matter".
How many other
textual carnivores are on the prowl in academe!?!?
References
End
Profile ACDM-1971-GOC
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Ward
Churchill


|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-WC |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
    
Red: Severe Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
Head of the University of Colorado's Ethnic Studies
Program; Ethnic Studies Professor; Frequent guest
speaker on Ethnic Studies issues
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in published academic research, lengthy footnotes
notwithstanding; Allegedly called another professor
in the middle of the night to threaten, "I'll
get you for this!" after Dalhousie University
Professor Fay G. Cohen criticized Churchill for plagiarizing
her work
|
| Results: |
Plagiarism
allegations have re-surfaced as part of an effort
to oust Professor Churchill from his tenured position
after highly controversial remarks made in reference
to the 9-11 victims; Churchill called those Americans
who died in the World Trade Center collapse "little
Eichmanns" and spoke positively about the terrorists
who "successfully" attacked the symbols
of American economic and military strength; Resignation
of University of Colorado President Elizabeth Hoffman
was also related to Churchill's outspoken remarks;
also, a review of the tenure granting process was
undertaken by the state of Colorado, a result of the
controversy surrounding the granting of tenure to
"Churchill . . . the quintessential professor
run amok . . . ." (John Gravois in "Colorado
Governor Proposes Standardizing the Tenure Process,
a Possible Response to the Ward Churchill Controversy",
Chronicle of Higher Education)
|
| Known
for: |
Outspoken
views and controversial research related to ethnic studies
and Native American rights; Gained spectacular notoriety
as the "9-11 Prof" who compared the 9/11 victims
to Nazi war criminals
|
| Overview: |
The
plagiarism allegations concerning controversial "9-11
Prof" Ward Churchill had been around for some time
before they resurfaced in 2005. This re-surfacing of
plagiarism allegations seems to stem from Churchill's
notoriety and the wide publicity which the media gave
to a paper in which he likened the 9-11 victims to Nazi
war criminals, "little Eichmanns" as he referred
to them in his essay.
After a spate
of renewed controversy involving the cancellation of
several speaking engagements due to fears of protests
and the potential for violent confrontations, Churchill
refused to back down from his controversial remarks.
However, this
stance only hardened the resolve of those seeking to
remove Churchill from his tenured position at the University
of Colorado, the Colorado governor himself recommending
the university fire the troublesome 9-11 prof.
But because
he held a tenured position, Churchill could not necessarily
be removed simply for making controversial remarks,
no matter how outrageous. That would be a violation
of his academic freedom, and his freedom of speech.
So the attempts
to silence Churchill have focused on his published research,
another controversial area inclusive of the plagiarism
allegations.
He is alleged
to have plagiarized from other writers without proper
citation, to have distorted facts to suit his views,
to have made false claims regarding his Native American
heritage, to have infringed on the copyright of another
artist (copying a picture for a painting), and to have
generally engaged in sloppy scholarship:
"By researching
those copious endnotes, however, the discerning reader
will discover that notwithstanding all the provocative
sound and fury rumbling through his essays, Churchill's
analysis overall is sorely lacking in historical/factual
veracity and scholarly integrity" (John LaVelle,
University of New Mexico Law Professor who accused Churchill
of plagiarism in 1999).
Whether or
not the revisiting of these plagiarism allegations (and
other issues of academic integrity) will suffice to
warrant dismissal of Churchill from his tenured position
remains to be seen. He definitely hit a raw nerve with
many Americans in making such ill-advised comments,
and while the American right to freedom of speech protects
academics such as Churchill from direct retaliation
for his 9-11 remarks, these remarks have indirectly
contributed to a closer analysis of his scholarly record.
And this analysis may spell the undoing of the "9-11
Prof".
It's not a
happy conclusion for the academy as Thomas Brown of
Lamar University relates after assessing Churchill's
academic record: "It is a distressing conclusion.
One wants to think the best of fellow scholars. The
scholarly enterprise depends on mutual trust. When one
scholar violates that trust, it damages the legitimacy
of the entire academy . . . " (from a draft of
Brown's essay "Assessing Ward Churchill’s
Version of the 1837 Smallpox Epidemic").
Update: As the CU investigation of
plagiarism and misconduct allegations against Ward Churchill
drags on and on, the situation has been further complicated
by recent developments, namely the resignation of two
members of the 5 member panel appointed to investigate
"allegations of plagiarism, misuse of others' work
and falsification and fabrication in his research work".
Bruce Johansen (University of Nebraska, Omaha) and Robert
A. Williams (University of Arizona) announced their
resignations after apparent conflicts of interest surfaced
which led to criticisms about the "impartiality
of the panel" ("Professors Resign from Churchill
Research Investigation").
Another Update: A review of the tenure
granting process was undertaken by the state of Colorado,
without a doubt resulting from the controversy surrounding
the granting of tenure to "Churchill . . . the
quintessential professor run amok . . . ." (John
Gravois in "Colorado Governor Proposes Standardizing
the Tenure Process, a Possible Response to the Ward
Churchill Controversy", Chronicle of Higher Education).
Churchill
Investigation Completed: Dated
May 9,2006, the long-awaited "Report
of the Investigative Committee of the Standing Committee
on Research Misconduct at the University of Colorado
at Boulder
concerning Allegations of Academic Misconduct
against Professor Ward Churchill" has finally
been completed. The entire 125 page report (whew!) is
available for download from the University of Colorado
website
along with other information about the investigation
into the research misconduct allegations against the
infamous professor of ethnic studies with dubious claims
to American Indian ancestry. The report details findings
of serious and deliberate research misconduct including
fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism as well as
"Failure to comply with established standards regarding
author names on publications" and "Serious
deviation from accepted practices in reporting results
from research". Sanctions against Churchill have
yet to be determined with possibilities on the table
inclusing outright dismissal and revocation of tenure,
or the less harsh suspension without pay.
"U.of
Colorado Begins Process to Fire Ward Churchill":
Scott Smallwood reports in the Chronicle of Higher
Education that the University of Colorado has initiated
proceedings to dismiss the controversial "9-11
Prof" (Smallwood, S.).
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-WC
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Keith
Cook
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-KC |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
Chairman of the Orange County School Board
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in a high school graduation speech
|
| Results: |
Calls for
resignation; Loss of re-election in July 2004
|
| Known
for: |
Service on
the Orange County School Board
|
| Overview: |
When
Chairman of the Orange County School Board Keith Cook
decided to lift material for re-use in a high school
graduation speech, he was following the model of other
leaders in education who have plagiarized the content
of their speeches rather than write something up on
their own.
The only problem with such derivation is that people
are more intelligent than educrats often give them credit
for, and the unacknowledged copying is spotted by perceptive
listeners.
In this case, Keith Cook lifted a speech given by Donna
Shalala in 1998, and this bit of plagiarism prompted
calls for him to resign his position as School Board
Chairman. Cook did end up resigning, but he also announced
his intention to run for re-election to the school board.
In the end, he lost that election, voters deciding that
a plagiarist might not be the best choice for the important
business of the school board (K. T. Ataiyero; Darla
Miles).
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-KC
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| René
Diekstra
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-CJO |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
Faculty of Social Sciences Dean and Professor of Social
and Clinical Psychology at the University of Leiden
in the Netherlands
|
| Allegations: |
Copying of
other researchers' work; copying autobiographical
details and poetry of other authors
|
| Results: |
Had to leave
Leiden University in 1997; Loss of free-lance writing
opportunities; Diekstra continues to contest the charges
of plagiarism in spite of other instances of derivation
surfacing
|
| Known
for: |
Popular author
of books and articles on suicide, drug use, depression,
personality, psycho-social disturbance and other topics
from a psychological perspective
|
| Overview: |
René
Diekstra, a popular author from the Netherlands, presents
an interesting case study in the psychologist as plagiarist.
Diekstra had to leave his position at Leiden University
after allegations that he had been plagiarizing the
research of his colleagues, copying entire pages without
attribution.
Apparently un-rehabilitated as a plagiarist after his
1997 experience, Diekstra again fell afoul of the guidelines
governing use of other's work when he claimed to be
the author of a poem in a radio interview with a KRO
broadcast "Between Heaven and Earth". As a
guest of this program in 2001, Diekstra read a poem
which he gave indication as being his own, citing the
name of Hans Andreus as if he were inspired somehow
by Andreus.
Upon conducting
a fact-check, the editors of the program subsequently
discovered that they had been duped--the poem was a
word for word copying of a Hans Andreus poem. Upon being
confronted with this obvious plagiary over Holland's
airwaves, the editors of the broadcast report that Diekstra
continued his pattern of denial, claiming that the wording
of his Hans Andreus "acknowledgement", "freely
to Hans Andreus", meant that he had done nothing
wrong.
The psychological self-deception and the clues a plagiarist
leaves behind in such a public manner--as if he wants/needs
to be caught--would seem to be some important clinical
indicators in the Diekstra case. Therapy would seem
to be called for in cases where the plagiarist engages
in such obviously self-destructive behavioral patterns.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-CJO
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Susan
Duval

|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-SD |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in graduation speeches given by Duval at Springstead
High School
|
| Results: |
Anonymous
tip-off resulted in discovery of plagiarism; Referral
to the Florida Department of Education for possible
"action against her teaching certificate"(P.
Quinlan, "Duval's cribbing could be costly")
|
| Known
for: |
Effective
leadership at Springstead High School
|
| Overview: |
What's
the deal with the cribbing of commencement speeches
by high school principals?
After being found out for plagiarizing a Chicago
Tribune column by Mary Schmich in her 2005 graduation
speech, Springstead High School Principal Susan Duval
admitted to plagiarism in her 2004 graduation ceremony
as well.
An anonymous tip-off resulted in Duval's cribbed graduation
oratory being discovered, and the matter has been referred
to the Florida Department of Education which will investigate
the charges and consider possible "action against
her teaching certificate . . . ranging from a written
reprimand to the revocation of Duval's educator's certificate"
(P. Quinlan).
Letters to the Editor of the St. Petersburg Times
reflected outrage over the dishonest principal's unacknowledged
use of other authors' texts. Extracts from several letters
appear below:
In the real
world, which is what students are supposed to learn
about, punishment also exists with fines and lawsuits
and so forth. How are students supposed to understand
punishment if the principal of our school, who is
supposed to be a role model, is not punished? . .
.
Springstead
principal Susan Duval should be removed, not necessarily
for her poor judgment concerning her plagiarism of
other's works, but for her continual insistence that
her acts were "unintentional errors . . . The
act of pulling up another's speech on the Internet
is in no manner unintentional. Claiming the words
she found on the Internet were her own "personal
thoughts" also is in no way unintentional . .
. The woman suffers an integrity issue and is unable
or unwilling to admit her intentional transgressions
. . .
I'd say "cribs"
is too kind a word for anyone who cheats, even a principal
. . . What a legacy to leave to her students! Then
we wonder why young people have no qualms about cheating
or lying when it's to their advantage? . . . A cheat
is a cheat and no other word will suffice . . . ("Critics,
supporters assess principal's plagiarism", www.sptimes.com)
Abhi Raghunathan
of the St. Petersburg Times reported that
this is not the first time commencement speakers have
plagiarized Mary Schmich's Chicago Tribune column.
Other graduation speakers in a pinch have lifted portions
of this column which purports to be a "Sunscreen"
commencement speech delivered by Kurt Vonnegut at the
MIT graduation of 1997 ("'Sunscreen'
Speech Rings Familiar"). This is actually an
urban legend--Vonnegut never delivered this speech at
MIT, but the legend has made its rounds on the Internet,
and Duval is not the first commencement speaker to incorporate
components of "Sunscreen" into their address
to students at "the powerful life moment of college
[or high school] graduation" (Joan
E. Aitken)
Those calling for the Springstead High School Principal's
termination will have to wait to see whether the Florida
Department of Education revokes Duval's teaching credentials.
For now, both students and colleagues at Springstead
are recovering from the shock of discovering that their
principal plagiarized her graduation speeches, two years
in a row.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-SD
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Edward
Waters College
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-EWC |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Edward Waters
College was founded in 1866 with the mission of educating
newly freed American slaves
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in the text of the Edward Waters Quality Enhancement
Plan as part of the college's application for re-accreditation
|
| Results: |
Loss of accreditation
with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools;
Appeal of decision by EWC and lawsuit suit against
SACS; Dip in college enrollment; Change in leadership
as President Oswald P. Bronson, Sr. takes over after
a period of growth under the direction of President
Jimmy Jenkins
|
| Known
for: |
Florida's
oldest private college; Phenomenal growth in the 1990s
and honorable mention as one of "The Best of Florida
Schools 2004" in the Florida Leader magazine
|
| Overview: |
An
un-named administrator at Edward Waters College seems
to be responsible for a plagiarism scandal which happened
as the college was applying for re-accreditation with
the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
A report in Black Issues in Higher Education claims
that the Edward Waters' Quality Enhancement Plan was
found to contain identical wording lifted from a similar
document belonging to Alabama A & M University.
The Quality Enhancement Plan also lifted "detailed
statistical information" as part of the re-accreditation
bid.
As a result of this plagiarized Quality Enhancement
Plan, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
revoked the accreditation of Edward Waters College,
a major crisis for the small private college since 90%
of their students receive financial aid ("Edward
Waters College Brief History"). Without accreditation,
a college's students are ineligible for federal financial
aid, and organizations such as the United Negro College
Fund also base their membership decisions on the accreditation
status of member schools.
The college will most likely pull through this difficult
time. The loss of accreditation has been appealed, and
there has been a change in leadership as President Oswald
P. Bronson, Sr. took over after a period of growth under
the direction of President Jimmy Jenkins. Furthermore,
the college has the support of Florida Governor Jeb
Bush as well as the United Negro College Fund.
As this crisis at Edward Waters College so aptly illustrates,
plagiary always affects others. Former President Jenkins
tried to re-assure faculty and students that "This
is a new beginning", but many of the college's
1,300 students were probably wondering about their financial
aid status after this incident.
Thankfully, the financial aid will continue to be disbursed
throughout the appeal process. In the meantime, EWC
has filed a lawsuit against SACS alleging that their
due process rights were violated, SACS not giving EWC
an opportunity to respond to the plagiarism allegations
before the decision to revoke the college's accreditation
status.
Update:
As
of Thursday, June 23, 2005, Edward Waters College had
settled its lawsuit against SACS. The settlement includes
the re-instatement of EWC's accreditation with the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools (Fain, P. "Edward
Waters College, Backed by Legal Punch, Wins Reinstatement
of Accreditation").
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-EWC
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Melissa
Elias
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-ME |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
President of the Madison School Board (New Jersey)
|
| Allegations: |
Use of contents
and themes of a speech delivered by Pulitzer-Prize
recipient Anna Quindlen at the Mount Holyoke College
graduation ceremony of 1999
|
| Results: |
Forced to
resign after issuing a public apology; Re-affirmation
by the school board of high standards and ethical
expectations
|
| Known
for: |
Educational
leadership with the Madison School Board
|
| Overview: |
Madison
School Board President Melissa Elias was forced to resign
after evidence emerged that she had cribbed parts of
her 2005 commencement speech from a graduation address
delivered by Pulitzer-Prize recipient Anna Quindlen
at the Mount Holyoke College graduation ceremony of
1999 (L. Vernon-Sparks, "Madison board leader quits
over 'plagiarism'").
Before Elias' resignation, the Madison School Board
formulated a statement affirming that "The board
does not condone nor tolerate plagiarism within the
Madison School community and expects all members of
our community to adhere to the highest ethical standards"
("Side by side: Two texts in plagiarism furor",
The Madison Eagle).
Commencement speakers. Another one bites the dust!
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-ME
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Bindu
Ganga

|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2006-BG |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
    
Red: Severe Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Director
of Training and member of faculty at Argosy University-Chicago
|
| Allegations: |
"[E]gregious"
(John Barrie of Turnitin.com)
plagiarism in a Psy.D. thesis completed by Ganga
|
| Results: |
When
Argosy University student Marla Decker reported she
had found possible instances of plagiarism in Ganga's
thesis, the school held hearings on supposed "ethics
charges" against Decker, "decid[ing] to
dismiss Decker from the school [and] . . . criticiz[ing]
her professional comportment" (D. Newbart, "Student
scolded over plagiarism allegation"); Decker
was finally granted her degree, but the "ethics
charges" remain on her permanent record
|
| Known
for: |
Teaching,
training and administrative work in clinical psychology
|
| Overview: |
As
reported by the
Chicago Sun-Times in this case of a "Student
[being] scolded over plagiarism allegation"
, it was not the plagiarist who was first charged with
ethics violations, but the student who discovered the
violations of scholarship norms in a paper 'written'
by her professor! (D. Newbart, "Student Scolded
Over Plagiarism Accusation").
An
allegation directed against a member of Argosy
University's faculty resulted in what appears to
be an attempted institutional cover-up on behalf of
a plagiarist. After the student made allegations against
Bindu Ganga, "confid[ing] to a professor that she
believed Ganga's thesis might have been plagiarized",
she herself was accused of ethics violations involving
"a pattern of unprofessional comportment . . .
including disrespect toward those in authority"
! The Argosy University student,Marla Decker, did end
up receiving her degree after the university tried to
have her dismissed, and her 'ethics violations' ended
up as a "part of her permanent academic record"!
(D. Newbart, "Student Scolded Over Plagiarism Accusation")
What a crooked
way to deal with plagiarism accusations on the part
Argosy University officials! It gets even worse. The
title of Ganga's doctoral thesis? Deception vs.
Perception: A Critical Look at the Intricacies of Lying
Withing the Therapeutic Relationship, in which
Ganga borrows heavily from sources including Charles
Ford's book Lies! Lies!! Lies!!! without acknowledging
extensive verbatim appropriations.
Thanks to a
Turnitin.com "originality
report" commissioned by the Sun-Times,
the allegations
by Argosy Univesity student Marla Decker were substantiated
("a 45% match" as revealed by the "originality
report"), and the unethical attempts to silence
this student were exposed.
Update:
As of March 3, 2006, Argosy University had
reversed its earlier position and decided to fire Bindu
Ganga over the plagiarism allegations raised by Marla
Decker. As reported in the Sun-Times, Argosy
"also took away Ganga's doctorate in clinical psychology"
(Newbart, D. "University fires official accused
of plagiarism").
About time!
References
End
Profile ACDM-2006-BG
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Gary
A. Giamartino, Robert Carver & the SIUE School of
Business
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-GG/RC/SIUE |
| Name:
|
Gary
A. Giamartino; Robert Carver & the SIUE School
of Business
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
 
Blue: Guarded Risk
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Allegations: |
"[SIUE]
School of Business plagiarizes Web material"
(McKinney, T.); Cutting and pasting of content on
the "welcome from the dean" page from sources
such as content from the University of Southern California's
Marshall School of Business webpage
|
| Results: |
"The
allegations of plagiarism leveled by the Alestle
toward the School of Business are biased and exaggerated"
claimed Dean Giamartino in an editorial response;
He admitted the "composite" nature of web
content for the SIUE School of Business and said "It
is common practice for public relations-oriented text
to be composed by various individuals who work together
to create an image for an organization"; Dean
Giamartino also insinuated that his predecessor bore
responsibility for the "composite" nature
of his welcome page content: "It is the same
as it was when Dean Carver was here"
|
| Known
for: |
Leadership
at the School of Business, Southern Illinois University
Edwardsville
|
| Overview: |
Sources
in the know at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
see a storm coming. Locally, SIUE is cynically referred
to by some as CAPU, or Cut And Paste University,
due to the *composite* nature of certain web content
on official university websites.
Take for example
Dean Gary Giamartino's welcome page for the SIUE
School of Business. The SIUE newspaper published
an article claiming that the "School of Business
plagiarizes Web material" (McKinney, T.) after
it was discovered that the Dean's welcome message was
not all that original of a welcome statement. In fact,
portions of that statement were identical to another
website, mirroring phrasing from the University of Southern
California's Marshall School of Business webpage.
Such borrowing
of institutional, "corporately composed information"
(G. Giamartino) is not without precedent. Borrowing
the "Boilerplate"
language of other texts is actually more common than
might be at first realized. Indeed, plagiarism statements
themselves have been institutionally plagiarized as
it were, making the rounds from one school to another!
What makes the SIUE case stand somewhat apart from such
cases of "Boilerplate"
language appropriation is a troubling story involving
an SIUE professor's having been summarily dismissed
for the same infraction the Dean himself is now being
accused of. You guessed it--plagiarism.
An as yet un-named professor, rumoured at SIUE to have
initiated pending litigation as a result of such dismissal,
was fired after complications allegedly involving a
plagiarized teaching philosophy statement. More details
will evidently be forthcoming on this pending litigation
. . . Stay tuned . . .
For now, the unrest at SIUE over this case of "composite
. . . corporately composed information" is reflected
in the allegations and responses which have been publicly
voiced in The
Alestle. Students have been asking if they
too will now be allowed to employ such "composite"
composing techniques for their own assignments, and
they have asked for an apology from Dean Giamartino
(Darling, C. "Student says double standards reflect
poorly on SIUE"; McDonald, N. "Dean's actions
unacceptable, apology necessary").
For his part, the Dean maintains that "The allegations
of plagiarism leveled by the Alestle toward
the School of Business are biased and exaggerated"
and that he inherited the web content problems from
his predecessor, Dean Robert Carver: "The organizational
image we wanted to project did not change when I became
dean, so we felt no need to change the text of the welcome
message" ("Dean
offers response to plagiarism allegations").
Sounds like things are getting quite nasty between the
faculty and the admin at SIUE with pending litigation
to boot. Not good . . . not good at all.
Update: The "un-named" professor
dismissed from the SIUE School of Business has now been
named in the Alestle. In a call for Dean Giamartino
to resign, Tyson Giger wrote "Gimartino [sic] needs
to hold himself accountable for his actions. He fired
a finance professor, Chris Dussold for the same crime:
plagiarizing written word [sic]. If you cheat, which
is what plagiarism is, you're fired. Dismissal was the
standard that he set in the firing of Dussold. This
is a precedent he created. Since this dean cannot fire
himself, he should do the next best thing: resign"
(Giger, T. "SIUE
alum calls for dean's resignation" The
Alestle). Dussold's lawsuit was actually initiated
back in March of 2005 when he "filed a nine-count
defamation lawsuit . . . seeking at least $750,000 in
compensatory and punitive damages claiming his reputation
has been damaged . . . [relating to] 'impeach[ment of]
his honesty, integrity, virtue or reputation'"
(Gonzalez, S. "SIUE
Professor Files Defamation Suit" Madison
Record).
The
Latest: For recent info on the case involving
Chris Dussold, Giamartino, and SIUE, see the article
by T. Bartlett "The
Rumor: What really cost Chris Dussold his dream job?"
in the Chronicle of Higher Education.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-GG/RC/SIUE
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Lindsey
S.
Hamlin
(and co-
author
William T.
Ryan)
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2003-LSH |
| Name:
|
Lindsey
S. Hamlin
(and co-author William T. Ryan)
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Lindsey S.
Hamlin: Graduate Research Associate, Florida Atlantic
University
William T. Ryan: Associate Professor of International
Business, Florida Atlantic University
|
| Allegations: |
Unacknowledged
copying in a Syllabus published essay on
plagiarism
|
| Results: |
Complaint
by Michael Heberling, author of an article on "Maintaining
Academic Integrity in Online Education" (Online
Journal of Distance Learning Administration);
Hasty addition of an acknowledgement on the Syllabus
website at the end of article
|
| Known
for: |
Syllabus
magazine is well known for featuring information on
the use of technology within contexts of higher education
|
| Overview: |
Dan
Carnevale reported in The Chronicle of Higher Education
on the peculiar case of unacknowledged derivation in
Syllabus magazine (2003, June 20). A graduate
associate at Florida Atlantic University and her co-author,
not to mention Syllabus magazine, found themselves
in the awkward situation of having copied text without
acknowledgement in an article addressing plagiarism
by distance learning students.
Lindsey S. Hamlin and William T. Ryan, both of Florida
Atlantic University, lifted a few passages and employed
a bit of synonym substitution in their Syllabus
article "Probing for Plagiarism in the Virtual
Classroom". In the view of Michael Heberling, Hamlin
and Ryan's article came too close to the phraseology
of an article he had written on "Maintaining Academic
Integrity in Online Education" for the Online
Journal of Distance Learning Administration.
Carnevale reports that Heberling received an apology
from Ms. Hamlin: I honestly did not realize that some
of my verbiage was so close to yours . . . [H] ad I
realized that the language I used was so close, I would
have definitely referenced it . . . I apologize . .
. [I]t was not done intentionally."
Syllabus editor Mary Grush appended a reference
to Heberling's article at the end of Hamlin and Ryan's
essay, a "Band-Aid fix" in the view of Heberling,
and Professor Ryan exclaimed, "It's been blown
enormously out of proportion."
In the various genres of discourse--including scholarly
discourse--plagiarism in a text about the very phenomenon
of plagiarism itself is an occasional happenstance.
And it just may get even more complicated than that--plagiarism
of an article about plagiarism which has plagiarized
another text on the subject which might itself contain
substantial portions of unacknowledged, derived language
chunks!
References
End
Profile ACDM-2003-LSH
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Blair
Hornstine
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-RLJ |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Moorestown
High School (NJ)student and Harvard University applicant
at the time plagiarism allegations surfaced
|
| Allegations: |
Repeated
instances of plagiarism in the Courier-Post newspaper
of Cherry Hill, New Jersey; these allegations surfaced
after Hornstine's widely publicized lawsuit against
Moorestown High School to have herself recognized
as the sole valedictorian
|
| Results: |
Revocation
of acceptance to Harvard University and public humiliation
associated both with the plagiarism incidents and
valedictorian lawsuit
|
| Known
for: |
Hornstine
had previously been recognized for involvement in social
projects such as the co-founding of MAGIC, the Moorestown
Alliance for Goodwill and Interest in the Community;
Also known for being involved in "drives for cleft
lip correction surgery for orphans, prom dresses, 9/11
victims, and food for the hungry" ("Blair
Hornstine", Wikipedia)
|
| Overview: |
Poor, privileged Blair Hornstine didn't have the common
sense to say "No thanks, Dad!" to her father
Louis Hornstine, a New Jersey State Supreme Court judge
who had determined to "manipulate the rules designed
to protect disabled students for the purpose of allowing
(Blair) to win the valedictorian award" ("Blair
Hornstine", Wikipedia).
Her *disabled*
condition? Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and possibly
an immune deficiency which exempted her from formal
school attendance, allowing her to receive instruction
at home without having to take physical education, a
demanding course which would probably have lowered her
GPA just a fraction enough to bring her score down to
the level of her closest competitor for class valedictorian.
These circumstances prompted Mooretown High School to
name two valedictorians, and the Hornstine family promptly
sued in federal court to have Blair named as the
one and only valedictorian, and they also sought
$2.7 million from the state court as "punitive
and compensatory damages" ("Report: Blair
Hornstine Dropped from Harvard for Plagiarism").
Understandably,
this move did not endear the promising young Ivy League
applicant to her Moorestown classmates, and the Hornstines
found their home generously decorated with free toilet
paper and several dozen lobbed eggs. This was just the
beginning of Hornstine's woes.
Plagiarism allegations would surface next concerning
a column by Hornstine featured in the Cherry Hill Courier-Post.
In these regular columns, it was discovered that Hornstine
had lifted text from
sources without attribution. Even before these allegations
surfaced, an online petition signed by "nearly
2,700"[!] people "call[ed] for Harvard to
rescind Hornstine's acceptance". The incidents
of plagiarism provided impetus to the petitioners' request("Report:
Blair Hornstine Dropped from Harvard for Plagiarism").
Harvard obliged in July 2003 and decided not to admit
a high school plagiarist into the hallowed halls of
the ivy league . . .
. . . WAIT A MINUTE ! ! ! . . .
What about Professor
Charles Ogletree?
How about former Professor
Doris Kearns Goodwin?
And let's not forget about Professor
Laurence Tribe!
Had she gone to Harvard, Blair Hornstine would have
found herself among members of the plagiarazzi,
plagiary's elite--the Ivy League Plagiarists.
What's a little bit of plagiarism by a high school girl
compared to your own professors' wholesale lifting of
text in their books?
It seems rather hypocritical--doesn't it?--to state
"It would be unusual for Harvard not to rescind
the admission of a student caught plagiarizing"
(Marilyn McGrath, Harvard Director of Undergraduate
Admissions in "Report: Blair Hornstine Dropped
from Harvard for Plagiarism") when your own professors
are kept on after doing exactly the same thing?
The sad case of Blair Hornstine . . . There seems to
have been more outrage and public response to the plagiaries
of this wayward young high school student than to the
textual pilferings of the glib and gifted profs inhabiting
the ivory towers. If only her family hadn't sued Moorestown
High, this gifted young plagiarist might have been happily
plagiarizing her way along toward her degree in Harvard's
class of 2007--in the good company of fellow plagiarists,
it might also be noted (see the "Harvard
Plagiarism Archives").
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-RLJ
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Richard
L. Judd |
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-RLJ |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
 
Blue: Guarded Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
President of Central Connecticut State University
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in portions of an opinion article published in The
Hartford Courant
|
| Results: |
Forced into
early retirement after allegations became widely known
|
| Known
for: |
Leadership
at Central Connecticut State University
|
| Overview: |
You
know things are really bad when the President
of a state university has to retire because of plagiarism
allegations for which a college student would be severely
reprimanded, if not expelled!
Richard L.
Judd apparently lifted parts of an opinion article which
he wrote for The Hartford Courant. After discovery
of Judd's plagiarism, including material from sources
such as the New York Times, editorial-page-editor
John J. Zakarian lamented, "The Courant regrets
publishing Judd's article."
Judd resigned
from his position as President of Central Connecticut
State University days after the allegations surfaced.
Just like a student who withdraws from a college course
after, *ahem*, a bit of difficulty coping with
the courseload.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-RLJ
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Bryan
LeBeau
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2003-BL |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Professor
of History and Dean of the University of Missouri's
College of Arts and Sciences (Kansas City); Also the
host of the "Talking History" weekly radio
program
|
| Allegations: |
Oral plagiarism
of a speech by Cornel West in a commencement address
delivered in December 2003 at the University of Missouri,
Kansas City
|
| Results: |
Discovery
made by a Google search; Publication of allegations
in different venues inclusive of blog sites; Placed
on administrative leave; Calls from the University
of Missouri faculty for the resignation of LeBeau;
Bowed out as a candidate for an adminstrative post
at DePaul University
|
| Known
for: |
Authoring
and editing various books on history; hosting the nationally
syndicated "Talking History" radio program
|
| Overview: |
Another
historian accused of plagiarism, another commencement
address as the venue for delivery of a speech freighted
with unacknowledged derivation. Bryan LeBeau now joins
the ranks of H. Joachim Maitre
and others who thought they could get away with cribbing
their speech from the graduation platform. Commencement
addresses would seem to present a unique category of
rhetorical thievery given the number of educators who
have used graduation platforms to convey their learned
liftings from more capable colleagues.
Although Professor LeBeau is a historian, because he
orally plagiarized in a more general commencement address
which was subsequently published in the "Dean's
Newsletter", the LeBeau profile appears here with
other general cases of academic plagiarism on the FamousPlagiarists.com
website.
LeBeau and other plagiarists seem to be unaware of the
technological advances which make verbatim plagiary
so easy to detect. They underestimate the power of Google.
In May of 2005, two years after LeBeau's plagiarized
commencement address, Sally Greene was Googling
for the phrase "history is a slaughterhouse"
when up popped the very similar speeches of Bryan LeBeau
(2003) and Cornel West (1993). As a member of the academic
community herself, Greene felt an obligation to report
her discovery, so she contacted the Chronicle of
Higher Education which subsequently ran an article
on this case of oral plagiarism (E. Ferreri, "Google
search uncovers plagiarism").
After the Google search gave the game away for LeBeau
and his case of oral plagiarism back in 2003, it became
apparent that this instance of plagiarism carried certain
telltale indicators common to derivative texts, oral
or written. Errors from the original texts are frequently
carried over into the derivative text by a plagiarist.
Thomas Bartlett points out that both Cornel West and
Bryan LeBeau misspell the name of novelist Toni Morrison
in the published versions of their texts (Chronicle
of Higher Education, "Missouri Dean Appears
to Have Plagiarized Commencement Speech by Cornel West").
What makes this case of oral plagiarism
so grievous is the fact that LeBeau is a widely acknowledged
scholar and author/editor of numerous works, and also
the host for "Talking History"
[emphasis added], a nationally syndicated radio program
of the Organization of American Historians carried on
National Public Radio every week. LeBeau clearly understands
the need for integrity in scholarly contexts, particularly
"the powerful life moment of college graduation"
(Joan E. Aitken).
In a memo to the faculty of the College of Arts and
Sciences at the University of Missouri, LeBeau publicly
apologized:
As some of
you may know by now, the Chronicle of Higher Education
ran an article in which I was used as an example of
those making inappropriate use of material in a commencement
address. . . . I admit having made the error . . .
I failed to attribute . . . I apologize to all of
my colleagues in the College for any embarrassment
this might cause you. It is lesson [sic] learned the
hard way, that I hope to use in an instructive manner
come next semester.
Penitence two
years late is better than never. This case isn't over
yet. There have been publicized calls for LeBeau's resignation/termination.
He has also had to drop out of the running for a coveted
administrative post at DePaul University. And bloggers
have hinted that LeBeau might have also lifted from
a commencement address by Pulitzer Prize recipient Russell
Baker (E. Ferreri).
The way of transgressors is hard. So observed
King Solomon in his recorded proverbs millennia ago
in the distilled wisdom collected from various sages
and experiences--all of which the Hebrew king duly acknowledged
with textual references.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2003-BL
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| James
Mackay
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2001-JM |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
   
Orange: High Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Acclaimed
biographer of Robert Burns, Editor of the Burns
Chronicle, Author
|
| Allegations: |
"spectacular
and sustained plagiarism" in as many as four
books
|
| Results: |
Loss of reputation
as the foremost scholarly authority on Scotland's
National Bard, controversy over use of previous sources,
feeding frenzy resulting from academic colleagues
jealous of Mackay's status, monetary compensation
paid to settle claims of plagiarism
|
| Known
for: |
Self made
status as an academic, winner of the 1994 Saltire Award
|
| Overview: |
In
one of the more poignant cases of plagiarism, the biographer
of Robert Burns, a recognized authority on Scotland's
National Bard, has been accused of "spectacular
and sustained plagiarism" in as many as four of
his biographies. Experts in forensic linguistics have
compared Mackay's texts with the alleged source texts
and have concluded that enough evidence exists to warrant
charges of plagiarism.
Mackay, a self-made
scholar, felt on his part that he was being targeted
by other scholars who were jealous of his reputation
and standing as a Burns scholar. However, as Mackay
did not cite the earlier works from which passages appear
to have been lifted verbatim, his reputation is likely
to suffer damage with so many passages having been lifted
without acknowledgement.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2001-JM
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| H.Joachim
Maitre
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-1991-HJM |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
   
Orange: High Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
Boston University professor of journalism and international
relations and Dean of the College of Communication;
Before coming to Boston University, Maitre was an
editor and correspondent for the German newspapers
Die Welt and Die Welt am Sonntag
|
| Allegations: |
Unacknowledged,
verbatim appropriation of an article by Michael Medved
for re-use in a commencement speech
|
| Results: |
Removed from
his position as Dean of the College of Communication
|
| Known
for: |
Emigrating
from Germany to the US; Taking a firm stance on controversial
issues in his new, high profile position with Boston
University
|
| Overview: |
Just
like the case involving presidential aspirant Joe
Biden a few years before, evidence for the unacknowledged
borrowing in the H. Joachim Maitre case existed in the
form of incontrovertible videotape recording.
In delivering a commencement address on May 12,1991,
Boston University's Dean of the College of Communication
had lifted the the "basic theme and organization"--much
of it word for word--from an article by Michael Medved
as reported in the Boston Globe by Anthony
Flint and Muriel Cohen ("BU dean used the words
of another; Source not given during speech").
The subject of Maitre's commencement address? Of all
things, upholding standards. "My
article was all about upholding standards" said
Medved about his article which had first appeared in
the journal Imprimis, and then in condensed
form in Reader's Digest.
Maitre launched into his borrowed commencement
speech with a three-pronged assault in the form of an
outline encompassing "traditional values, family
and religion . . . [employing] the same examples and
anecdotes that Medved does" as the Boston Globe
reporters related about a month and a half after
the now notorious address to the graduating class of
journalists and filmmakers.
The speech included Maitre's supposed commentary on
the movie "The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her
Lover" as part of his three pronged assault on
the decline in standards, yet analyses and side-by-side
comparison of the speech with Medved's article revealed
the unacknowledged derivation which had taken place,
a lapse in Maitre's own standards of scholarly integrity
[or perhaps his administrative, behind-the-scenes speechwriter].
After the Boston Globe publicized Maitre's
unacknowledged derivation, Boston University President
Jon Westling dismissed Maitre from his position as Dean,
an unhappy ending for the relatively recent hire whom
Westling had brought on board from Germany to teach
journalism and international relations at Boston University.
But this profile in plagiarism doesn't end here! In
writing up this story for the New York Times,
the Boston bureau chief for the Times found
the Globe's take on Maitre's plagiarism too
tempting to resist. So what does Fox
Butterfield do? He swipes some of those irresistible
chunks of text from Flint and Cohen's article and tries
to pass them off as his own . . . but that's
another profile in the category of journalism.
References
End
Profile ACDM-1991-HJM
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Charles
J. Ogletree, Jr.
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-CJO |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
  
Yellow: Elevated Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Harvard Law
School Professor
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in his book All Deliberate Speed
|
| Results: |
Internal
investigation, calls for tenure revocation, public
apology by Ogletree, creation of the "Harvard
Plagiarism Archives" by anonymous Harvard students
|
| Known
for: |
Scholarship
investigating Brown vs. Board of Education
|
| Overview: |
In
yet another embarrassment for Harvard University, one
of its renowned law professors was discovered to have
published a book containing about several pages of text
lifted verbatim from another book without proper citation.
Professor Charles
Ogletree's book All Deliberate Speed contained
six paragraphs which directly copied text from Professor
Jack Balkin's book What Brown v. Board of Education
Should Have Said.
An internal
review at Harvard found that this was an "honest
mistake" although others expressed serious concern
about the type of scholarship for which a Harvard student
might be expelled or otherwise disciplined.
Ogletree basically
blamed his research assistants for the bit of plagiarized
text, although he did accept full responsibility in
a public apology: "I made a serious mistake during
the editorial process of completing this book, and delegated
too much responsibility to others during the final editing
process. I was negligent in not overseeing more carefully
the final product that carries my name. I accept full
responsibility for this error and apologize to Professor
Balkin, NYU Press, my colleagues, students and others
for this serious mistake."
The issue of "celebrity professors" facing
the music "for the egregious sins of ill-trained
assistants" is commented on by David J. Garrow
in his Wilson Quarterly review of P.C. Hoffer's
Past Imperfect: Facts, Fictions, Fraud--American
History from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles,
Ellis, and Goodwin. And this is an issue which
probably more than a few university professors are contemplating,
perhaps wondering whether their research assistants
might have done something similar in one of their publications.
The
"Harvard
Plagiarism Archives" gives the student response
to a perceived "meltdown in scholarly integrity"
at one of America's most well-regarded ivy league institutions
of higher learning. Whether committed by the professor
himself or his research assistants, the fact that plagiarized
material has somehow entered the professional discourse
of academia is a very serious concern.
Scholarly integrity
is such an important and vital issue, and perceived
lapses are bound to have an effect on both individuals
and the academy.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-CJO
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Elizabeth
Paige Laurie
 |
|
| Profile: |
POPF/NF-2004-EPL |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
   
Orange: High Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Recent college
graduate from University of Southern California, Wal-Mart
heiress
|
| Allegations: |
Cheating
and plagiarizing her way through college
|
| Results: |
A sports
arena which was named after Paige Laurie and built
thanks to a donation from her Wal-Mart dynasty family,
had to be re-named post-ribbon cutting (see picture
above) after the scandal broke on ABC's 20/20
where Paige Laurie's roommate claimed in full public
view to have written papers and otherwise helped the
Wal-Mart heiress to cheat her way through college
|
| Known
for: |
Being an
up and coming member of the Wal-Mart family dynasty
|
| Overview: |
Elizabeth
Paige Laurie just did what many other college students
do these days to cheat their way through college. She
paid her roommate to write her papers for her, a quick
and easy way to have custom-made term papers done in
the convenience of your dorm room! Plus, you don't have
to worry about downloading papers from Internet databases
with the fear that cheat-detection technology will spot
matching text.
Custom-made
term papers are all the rage these days when plagiarism-detection
services such as those offered by Turnitin.com, mydropbox.com,
plagiarism.com, and Essay Verification Engine are able
to spot lifted language and match it up with the source
text.
Of course,
students can't always be so sure that the "custom
made" papers for which they are paying good money
aren't paper downloads quickly accessed by "research
services" staff on the Internet.
This probably
helps to explain why Elizabeth Paige Laurie preferred
to pay her roommate, Elena Martinez, for her "custom
made" papers in exchange for about $20,000 over
several years.
The University
of Southern California claims to be "investigating"
these allegations according to Michael Jackson, the
vice president of Student Affairs.
Meanwhile,
Paige-Laurie has skipped happily off with a communications
degree in hand as of May 2004. But after her parents
donated money to the University of Missouri and had
a sports arena named after their daughter, they had
to agree to the school's request to rename the arena
in light of the academic controversy.
If Paige Laurie
weren't a Wal-Mart heiress, Martinez wouldn't have appeared
to voice her allegations, Paige-Laurie wouldn't have
had a sports arena named after her, and she would have
had to settle for the less expensive forms of plagiarism--cheating
for the common college student via paper databases
and "research services" available on the Internet.
Essay-Mart. Always low prices.
Always.
Update:
Reportedly,
Elizabeth Paige Laurie has "voluntarily . . . surrendered
her degree and returned her diploma to the university
[U of Southern CA]. She is [no longer] . . . a graduate
of USC." This surrendering of her degree seems
to have taken place sometime near the end of September
2005 judging by the announcement made by USC spokesman
James Grant ("Wal-Mart Heiress Returns USC Diploma"
Associated Press news article reported in Yahoo!
News and The New York Times).
References
End
Profile POPF/NF-2004-EPL
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Tina
Rosenberg

|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-TR |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Professor
in Gender Studies, Stockholm University; Feminist
activist and spokesperson
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
in her book Byxbegär ["Wearing
the Trousers" or "Trouser Desire"]
|
| Results: |
Alleged plagiarism
first detected in a review of Byxbegär
by Ingeborg Nordin in 2000; In 2005 Johan Tralau pointed
to the Rosenberg case as an instance of "gender
politics com[ing] before academic rigour"; Feminist
Initiative (Sweden's feminist party) spokesperson
Gudrun Schyman accused Tralau of harboring "misogynistic
prejudice" and criticized the close scrutiny
of gender studies specialists as resulting from a
"systematic campaign"; Rosenberg resigned
from the board of Feminist Initiative after the pressures
resulting from "being in the public eye . . .
[being] highly exposed, both by the media and by homophobes
in general" (Gudrun Schyman in "Rosenberg
quits Feminist Initiative).
|
| Known
for: |
Gender studies
and feminist activism
|
| Overview: |
Wallace and Gromit of "Techno-Trousers" fame
would be absolutely horrified! Trousers once again being
used to pull off a heist. This time a texto-trousers
rather than a techno-trousers heist.
In what would appear to be a case of wearing the
wrong trousers--somebody else's texto-trousers
that is--gender studies specialist/activist Tina
Rosenberg has been (re-)accused of using plagiarism
as a composition technique in
her book Byxbegär ["Wearing the Trousers"
or "Trouser Desire"]. According to The
Local's Andy Butterworth, the plagiarism allegations
had been known for some time before being repeated again
in an Axess journal article which analyzed
the "politicisation of academia" ("Feminist
professor accused of plagiarism" The
Local).
The texto-trousers plagiarism was first brought
out of the closet in a review of Byxbegär
by Ingeborg Nordin in 2000. Five years later in 2005
Johan Tralau cited the Rosenberg case as an instance
of "gender politics com[ing] before academic rigour".
In response, Feminist Initiative party spokesperson
Gudrun Schyman accused Tralau of harboring "misogynistic
prejudice" and criticized the close scrutiny of
gender studies specialists as resulting from a "systematic
campaign" to discredit gender studies specialists/activists.
For Johan Tralau, however, the Rosenberg case represents
"gender politics" taking precedence over the
actual research and inquiry upon which such feminist
activism is based. Slip-shod scholarship will certainly
not help the cause of gender activists. As Butterworth
reports, the case of the wrong texto-trousers
will be investigated by Stockholm University at an upcoming
faculty meeting.
Update:
A committee at Stockholm University has decided
that the plagiarism allegations against Rosenberg do
not merit investigation. Derstin Dahlbäck, the
dean of this committee noted that "Her [Rosenberg's]
intention was not to use Dekker and van de Pol's work
in an inappropriate way" ("No investigation
into Rosenberg"). No response as yet from Professor
Tralau in reply to email query sent by Dr. Lesko for
his take on this decision by Stockholm University not
to investigate these plagiarism allegations.
Professor Tralau Responds to Stockholm University's
Decision:
Professor Tralau reports that he has
responded
to Rosenberg's and her old supervisor's reactions
in
Expressen
. . . and in the latest issue of
Axess . . . giving
sufficient examples to show that she has copied a
number of phrases out of a book published by two other
scholars.
Furthermore, she has republished the book after having
been alerted to the fact that she had copied sentences
word by word without showing that her words were really
quotations. The claim that there are footnotes referring
to the book in
other parts of the chapter is irrelevant . . .
The response on the part of the faculty is hence surprising,
to put it mildly: the dean of the faculty claimed
that there are just different techniques of citing
people. One of which implies copying their words,
then, and not letting the reader understand that those
are quotations (from an email sent to Dr. Lesko by
Professor Tralau in response to the following query:
"What is your response to the decision of Stockholm
University to basically clear Rosenberg of any wrongdoing?").
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-TR
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Christopher
Sawyer-
Lauçanno

|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-CSL |
| Name:
|
Christopher
Sawyer-Lauçanno
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Lecturer
and Writer-in-Residence at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
comprising "wholesale borrowing, not only of
research but of storytelling and language" in
the recently released e.e. cummings, A Biography;
Disguising reliance on another author's research as
personal, primary research of his own.
|
| Results: |
Denial of
plagiarism by Sawyer-Lauçanno,
his lawyer, and his Sourcebooks publisher
|
| Known
for: |
Literary
scholarship
|
| Overview: |
A
Harper's Magazine book review by Wyatt Mason
accuses Christopher Sawyer-Lauçanno of plagiarizing
in his book on e.e. cummings, A Biography.
Allegedly, Sawyer-Lauçanno appropriated "storytelling
and language" from another e.e. cummings scholar,
Richard S. Kennedy, author of Dreams in the Mirror:
A Biography of e.e. cummings. Wyatt Mason claims
in his review that Sawyer-Lauçanno's book employs
"wholesale borrowing" without proper acknowledgement.
On his part,
Sawyer-Lauçanno maintains his innocence: "while
I clearly missed a few citations, I am not willing to
admit to plagiarism." And his publisher backs him
up: "Calling a few missed citations plagiarism
grossly exaggerates the mistakes."
Mason obviously disagrees. Having painstakingly researched
the previous biographies of e.e. cummings by Charles
Norman and Richard S. Kennedy, Mason recounts the archival
research and consultation of primary source documents
as well as intimate contact with e.e.cummings himself
in the case of Norman.
Contrasting this firsthand archival research by Norman
and Kennedy with that of Sawyer-Lauçanno, while
also acknowledging that Sawyer-Lauçanno had done
some archival research, Mason found the latest
biography of e.e.cummings to rely too much--way
too much--on the primary research, "storytelling
and language" of the now deceased Kennedy.
"This
is plagiarism" Mason concludes after citing numerous
examples of Sawyer-Lauçanno's linguistic and
scholarly debts to Kennedy.
Mason admits this problem of plagiarism is one he is
"extremely loath to touch", and he called
Sawyer-Lauçanno for a "long talk" to
discuss these disturbing findings. Sawyer-Lauçanno
claimed in this conversation that he had not "consciously
plagiarized", stating that he regretted not being
more thorough in citing his indebtedness to Kennedy.
After this conversation, as a bottom-of-the-page note
informs Harper's readers, Sawyer-Lauçanno
consulted with a lawyer and faxed some further information
to Harper's Magazine, modifying his stance
somewhat: "any un-attributed similarities are quite
trivial and seem to arise from our use of the same source
documents."
Having passed away in 2002, e.e. cummings biographer
Richard S. Kennedy must leave the defense of his authorship
in the hands of others . . . unless we have another
"sly and spectral" return of the Author underway,
the presumed deceased returning to haunt a plagiarist
and would-be Author-murderer.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-CSL
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Roger
Shepherd
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2002-RS |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
 
Blue: Guarded Risk
|
| Occupation: |
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarizing
sections of Structures of Our Time from another
professor's monograph.
|
| Results: |
Published
acknowledgement of wrongdoing, job dispute with New
School University after Shepherd was fired
|
| Known
for: |
Artistic
design, chairing the Department of Fine Arts at New
School University, writing online features for the Architectural
Record
|
| Overview: |
Although
this was not one of the most egregious cases of plagiarism
in academia, the verbatim copying of portions of text
from another professor's work was enough for New School
University to fire the Chair of their Fine Arts Department
in the Parsons School of Design. A job dispute followed
in which Shepherd claimed to have been unfairly terminated
from his position with the university. He did admit
though to the Chronicle of Higher Education that
this copying was "probably the worst thing I've
ever done."
References
End
Profile ACDM-2002-RS
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Rodney
Smith
|
............................
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2005-RS |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Formerly
President of the College of the Bahamas
|
| Allegations: |
Unacknowledged
use of a speech in a commencement address
|
| Results: |
Pressure
to resign only a year into his position as College
of the Bahamas President; A letter of resignation
was subsequently forthcoming with the resignation
to take effect as of August 31, 2005
|
| Known
for: |
Bold initiative
to transform the College of the Bahamas into the University
of the Bahamas by 2007
|
| Overview: |
Ho hum, another commencement address scandal. This time
at the College of the Bahamas by President Rodney Smith.
This sort of commencement address plagiary is old hat.
With commencement speakers setting such a deplorable
example at the "the powerful life moment of college
graduation" (Joan
E. Aitken), is it any wonder that students feel
free to do the same in their essays and college research
papers?
What a farce
for those students who plagiarize their
way through high school or college (thanks to Internet
paper mills and the "research services" industry)
and find themselves at graduation listening to a plagiarized
commencement address!
How apropos!
If you're such
a student, can you even spell apropos ?
Do you know what that means? Not that it matters anyway
if you've already graduated.
As reported by Tameka Lundy, President Rodney Smith
found himself on the hotseat after lifting parts of
a speech previously delivered by the President of New
York University John Sexton. Faced with pressure to
resign, Smith admitted having made a "terrible
mistake" and expressed his desire to "remove
any further negative and damaging media frenzy from
the doorsteps of this great institution [College of
the Bahamas]". Evidently, a committee appointed
by the College Council to investigate the plagiarism
allegations against Smith had advised him to either
resign or face termination (Lundy, T. "Smith Gives
Up").
From students to academic
deans all the way up to college and university
presidents, members of scholarly communities are
responsible for acknowledging their sources of influence--particularly
verbatim derivation--and adhering to the conventions
of academic discourse.
On a side note, if the commencement address plagiary
trend continues, FamousPlagiarists.com may
need to add a whole new category to the list: "Lifted
Commencement Speeches" perhaps, or should it rather
be called "Recycled Graduation Oratory".
References
End
Profile ACDM-2005-RS
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Su
Tsui-yun
Lin Tsai-mei
|
Lin Tsai-mei
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2003-LTM/STY |
| Name:
|
Su
Tsui-yun; Lin Tsai-mei
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Su Tsui-yun
was a business and management major at Chinese Culture
University in Taiwan; Her mother, Lin Tsai-mei, was
the chancellor of the university but has since resigned
that position, remaining as the Director for the School
of Business
|
| Allegations: |
Lin Tsai-mei
allegedly allowed her daughter and advisee to copy
from one of her books for use in a master's degree
disseration
|
| Results: |
Scandal in
the Taipei press; Lin Tsai-mei forced to resign as
university chancellor; Su Tsui-yun's master's degree
revoked; Allegations of an attempted cover-up by University
President Chang Ching-hu; New penalties discussed
by Taiwan's Ministry of Education in similar cases
|
| Known
for: |
Administrative
work at Taiwan's Chinese Culture University
|
| Overview: |
Jewel
Huang of the Taipei Times reported in 2003
on an apparent mother-daughter duo engaging in a bit
of plagiarism to help the daughter finish her master's
degree in business management with the Chinese Culture
University ("Plagiarism penalties to be set for
university advisers").
There was a slight problem with this strategy. Lin Tsai-mei
happened to be the university chancellor! And she was
also the master's degree advisor for her daughter, Su
Tsui-yun. Allegedly, Lin allowed her daughter to copy
portions of her book for use in her dissertation on
business management. Some 90 pages of her dissertation
out of 110 were copied directly by Su from her mother's
book.
Once this plagiarism was brought into public view, Su's
degree was revoked and Lin was forced to resign her
position as chancellor of Chinese Culture University,
continuing on with the university as Director of the
School of Business.
Faced with such corruption at high levels of university
administration, but not wanting to interfere in the
self-governance of the Chinese Culture University, the
Taiwanese Ministry of Education began planning for new
penalties to deal in the future with such blatant violations
of scholarly integrity.
At the same time, one university trustee claimed that
university president Chang Ching-hu was engaging in
a cover up for this mother-daughter derivative duo.
The trustee, Mu Ming-chu, was reported to have put a
knife to President Chang's throat in an attempt to have
him remove Lin entirely from any association with the
Chinese Culture University.
Trustee Mu was the wife of President Chang, and suspecting
an amorous liason between President Chang and Chancellor
Lin, seemed to have more than one form of cheating on
her mind as she confronted her husband over keeping
a plagiarist-collaborator on at the university after
such a flagrant violation of academic standards.
References
End
Profile ACDM-2003-LTM/STY
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Laurence
H. Tribe
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-1985-LHT |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
  
Yellow: Elevated Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Harvard University
Law Professor
|
| Allegations: |
Extensive
borrowing and plagiarism in his 1985 book, God
Save This Honorable Court
|
| Results: |
Investigation
by Harvard University in 2004; adverse effect on possible
nomination to the Supreme Court; Harvard students
themselves create a "Harvard Plagiarism Archives"
website to confront the "meltdown in scholarly
integrity that has occurred at Harvard Law School
. . . due
to how plagiarism issues involving its celebrity professors
have been swept under the rug" (Anonymous Harvard
Blogger)
|
| Known
for: |
Scholarship
on constitutional law; representing Al Gore in legally
contesting the presidential election of 2000
|
| Overview: |
A
Harvard University professor who had a fairly good chance
of becoming a nominee for the US Supreme Court (with
a Democratic presidential administration) has acknowledged
that a book he wrote in 1985 lifted passages from another
scholar's book without proper acknowledgement. Tribe
issued a public apology only after his plagiary was
revealed in a magazine, The Weekly Standard.
The revelation
of Tribe's plagiarism (in a conservative publication)
occurred nearly twenty years after the fact. A timely
reminder that the passage of time and the development
of new technology increase the likelihood of a plagiarist's
plagiarisms being found out!
How Harvard
University has dealt so leniently with plagiarism by
their "celebrity professors" has recently
been taken up by a group of concerned Harvard students
who have developed the "Harvard
Plagiarism Archives" in response to what they
quite properly see as a "meltdown in scholarly
integrity".
When "ill-trained
[research] assistants" (David J. Garrow) are employed
in the writing of scholarly texts, it seems only natural
that these assistants are not going to be as concerned
about the final product since their names are not going
to be on the front cover (assuming that we buy the "research
assistant made me do it" line). In the end, it
must be the author who takes responsibility for any
lapses in scholarship within the pages of scholarly
texts bearing the author's name.
References
End
Profile ACDM-1985-LHT
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Tauseef
Ur Rehman (and his students)
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-2004-TUR/KAH/UWA/JA/SR |
| Name:
|
Tauseef
Ur Rehman; Khawaja Amer Hayat; Umar Waqar Anis; Junaid
Aslam, Saad Rafique
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Professor
and Head of the Department of Telecommunication Engineering
at the International Islamic University, Islamabad,
Pakistan
|
| Allegations: |
Plagiarism
of a 1997 paper by John Kelsey, David Wagner, and
Bruce Schneier in a 2004 SIGCSE Bulletin article;
Plagiarism of a paper by French cryptographer Serge
Vaudenay
|
| Results: |
Inquiry by
the International Islamic University; Removal of ur-Rehman's
name from the list of approved Higher Education Commission
supervisors; Letters of apology from ur-Rehman and
his students in which the students and ur-Rehman indicated
that the students were at fault
|
| Known
for: |
Research
and teaching at the university level; Known by students
as a stickler for "no cheating" policies which
he enforced in exams
|
| Overview: |
Plagiarism
by a Pakistani professor and/or his students (depending
on whether the professor's defense is credible) at the
International Islamic University in Islamabad has resulted
in disciplinary action. The professor has been removed
from the list of HEC (Higher Education Commission) approved
supervisors in spite of his claims that it was basically
his students' fault that the plagiary occurred ("Chairman
HEC Takes Serious Note of Plagiarism").
The professor's claims might seem a bit more credible
if this were the only instance of blatant plagiarism,
yet there are at least three cases: one case involving
plagiarism of a 1997 paper by John Kelsey, David Wagner,
and Bruce Schneier; another case involving plagiarism
of a paper by French cryptographers Serge Vaudenay et
al. And yet another case involving plagiarism of Ville
Hallivuori's "Analysis of Real-time Transport Protocol
Security", this time with Ur-Rehman, Junaid Aslam,
and Saad Rafique. The first two papers dealt with cryptanalysis,
and Umar Saif observes the following with regard to
the first case:
It's clearly
plagiarism. Sentences have been reworded or summarized
a bit and many typos have been introduced, but otherwise
it's the same paper. It's copied, with the same section,
paragraph, and sentence structure--right down to the
same mathematical variable names. It has the same
quirks in the way references are cited . . . If I
sound angry, I'm not. I'm more amused. I've heard
of researchers from developing countries resorting
to plagiarism to pad their CVs, but I'm surprised
see it happen to me . . . it's nice to know that our
work is still considered relevant eight years later
[can't fool a cryptanalyst!] ("Plagiarism").
With three
cases currently having been discovered, it rather seems
that Ur-Rehman might be heading up a team of dedicated
plagiarists at the International Islamic University!
The Textual Taliban ! (Talib simply
means "student" in Arabic).
Ur-Rehman offered his "sincere apologies"
in a letter to Kelsey, Wagner, and Saif, *admitting*
that "as a supervisor I failed to properly check
the validity of the paper." His students backed
him up in their letter of apology:
. . . The
whole episode occurred because of temptations in a
weak moment where we crossed the line.
Please accept our apologies and we give you our word
of honor that such an inhumane act will never be done
from our side . . . we are ashamed of our selves and
we have ruined our careers. Please Forgive us.
Online discussion
of this case at www.paktribune.com
ranged from a defense of Professor Ur Rehman
by one student at the International Islamic University:
i just want
u ppl to look at the other part side of the picture
that wht sort of effects this wuld produce in Dr.
Tauseef's life, his complete career is on stake, none
of the uni will accept him, he n his family r gona
suffer badly due to all of this.I think Dr. Tauseef
must have learnt enuff by this incident n guys after
all that person has remained a teacher n teacher in
our society our religion is respected equivalent to
a father . . . i wuld request u not aggravate further
this incident n just stop all the inquiries n actions
against Dr. Tauseef. . . . Dont just ruin his life.
To a harsh criticism of a "big cheater" teacher
by another student:
He is always
saying in the examination hall. No cheating! No cheating.
But, I know I understand that why no one was not listening
to his words carefully as he is a big cheater (Yes
I am talking about my cheater teacher Mr. Tauseef.).
He is not eligible to be a teacher of our great institution.
But farely
there are many black sheeps in our institution through
this forum I want to do something against them . .
. I am not mentioning my name because I am afraid
of him as he has power and can spoil any body's career.
Clearly Professor
Ur Rehman has a reputation of sorts at his home institution.
That reputation has now been garnished with further
descriptors and unique qualification for padding his
CV:
- Head of
Several Dedicated Teams of Plagiarists at International
Islamic University
- Encouraged/Taught
Students to Develop Strategic Skills in Derivative
Composing Techniques
- Shared
the Glory for Successful Papers; Denied Involvement
When Problems With Student Research Developed
- Known as
one of the "Big Cheater" Teachers and "Black
Sheep" Professors On Campus
- Well Trained
in Writing Letters of Apology
CV
padding is quite common among academic researchers.
Papers are frequently recycled with slight title modifications
and tweaking of content to give the impression that
more papers have been written than is actually the case.
The Ur Rehman (et al) Pakistani plagiarism ring is a
case study in CV padding which occurs using other
scholars' papers. Why didn't these guys realize that
sooner or later other crypanalysts would catch on and
decipher what was going on with their derivative discourse?
References
End
Profile ACDM-2004-TUR/KAH/UWA/JA/SR
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Wang
Mingming
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-1998-WM |
| Name:
|
|
War
on
Plagiarism
Threat Level: |
|
| Occupation: |
Xiamen and
London University educated social anthropologist;
Beijing University Professor of Sociology; formerly
Director of Beijing University's Folklore Study Center
and the Teaching and Research Section on Anthropology
|
| Allegations: |
Lifting of
entire sections of a US professor's on Cultural
Anthropology , more than 100,000 words, for use
in Wang's book Imaginary Alien Nation
|
| Results: |
Dismissed
from administrative and teaching positions at Beijing
University; Communist Party membership revoked; Outpouring
of support from students
|
| Known
for: |
Inspirational
teaching and research in social anthropology
|
| Overview: |
Modern
China's relative tolerance of copyright infringement
is evident in the pirated movies, music CD's, and counterfeit
brandname items widely available for sale. In an article
entitled "Plagiarism in China fuels debate on intellectual
theft", the Christian Science Monitor
represents a controversy over academic
standards and intellectual property as coming to a head
in the Wang Mingming case.
This case dates back to around 1987 when Wang was the
co-translator of a book on Cultural Anthropology
by US professor and anthropologist William Haviland
of the University of Vermont. This translation into
Chinese of Haviland's work was done with permission.
Wang's later copying from the same work was done without
proper acknowledgement.
I n 1998, Wang evidently found Haviland's book so useful
that he decided to copy entire sections amounting to
over 100,000 words for use in his own book Imaginary
Alien Nation. Wang Xiaosheng, a doctoral student
at Capital Normal University, reported his discovery
in a Shanghai social sciences journal.
As in other countries, there is great concern about
a perceived "academic plague" of cheating
behavior among students, including students pursuing
advanced graduate degrees and academic/scientific qualifications.
An article in China Daily reports Zhu as warning,
"Institutions of higher learning should never shelter
academic cheaters" ("Plagiarism brews academic
storm", China Daily).
Beijing University students offered a tremendous "outpouring"
of support for Wang, a young and popular professor recognized
for important contributions to social anthropology studies
in China. Students asked questions such as, "How
many books . . . are written totally by the authors?
Even students' papers are copies of others" (Christian
Science Monitor). These student observations may
have more substance to them than academics would like
to admit, not just in Chinese universities, but in other
countries as well.
The Wang plagiarism incident is notable for both the
extent of lifted material and also for the nature of
the plagiary itself, the fact that the lifting was an
inter-lingual incident of academic plagiary. Globalisation
and the inter-connectedness of communities across national
boundaries makes it increasingly more difficult for
an inter-lingual plagiarist to effectively conceal such
textual crimes. Once more, we must chalk one up for
a perceptive student, Wang Xiaosheng, who wasn't willing
to just look the other way when he came across this
egregious lapse in academic scholarship.
References
End
Profile ACDM-1998-WM
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| Neil
Winn
|
|
| Profile: |
ACDM-1996-NW |
| Name:
|
|
| War
on Plagiarism Threat Level: |
   
Orange: High Risk
|
| Occupation: |
Senior Lecturer
in European Studies / formerly Director of Learning
and Teaching, University of Leeds, Institute for Politics
and International Studies
|
| Allegations: |
Exappropriation
of journal article text for use in a book on European
Crisis Management in the 1980s
|
| Results: |
Little effect
on academic career, Mr. Winn in effect being "given
a second chance" by Leeds University after admitting
he had plagiarized
|
| Known
for: |
Research
and teaching on European studies
|
| Overview: |
Chalk
one up for a perceptive student in this case!
Harvard University
student Todd Fine is credited with noticing the similarities
between an article in the International Studies
Quarterly and the book by Neil Winn on European
Crisis Management in the 1980s.
Instead of
just passing over these similarities, the perceptive
student passed on his observations made simply by coincidence
while researching his senior thesis. As Fine observed,
Winn had made minor changes such as converting spellings
from American to British convention.
This case is
a classic example of the difficulties faced by individuals
in confronting plagiarism. Todd Fine and others found
that other academics and even professional organizations
seemed very hesitant to take any kind of actions involving
the confrontation of a plagiarist. (both Leeds University
and Blackwell Publishing responded with letters to the
Chronicle editor--note the apparent
concern about public perceptions in their letters with
regard to this case link).
As The
Chronicle of Higher Education writers Thomas Bartlett
and Scott Smallwood report, "academe appears conflicted
about what to do about the plagiarist."
Having been
"given a second chance" according to Leeds
University Head of Communications Vanessa Bridge, Neil
Winn's academic career remains intact, and as Bartlett
and Smallwood also report, "[Winn's] book, the
one with five plagiarized pages in the introduction,
is still listed on his university web page." [still
listed on the date this profile was created--removed
from the Leeds University website sometime in April
2005 following an email
exchange with Dr. Lesko in which the Leeds University
Head of Communications threatened to "put this
in the hands of our lawyers"
! ]
References
End
Profile ACDM-1996-NW
|
...
...
________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 
Found
something useful at this site? Want to see the
public naming/databasing of plagiarists continue?
Please consider dropping a bit of spare change
in the hat via secure PayPal in support of the
Famous Plagiarists Research Project (web hosting,
database management, ongoing research).
|
Michael
Bellesiles
Alan M. Dershowitz
Richard L. Judd
Ric Charlton and Roger Holmes: Aiding and Abetting, Newcastle
Plagiarists
Elizabeth
Paige Laurie
Friedrich
Nietzsche
Balwant
Singh Rajput
Roger
Shepherd
back
to top
Disclaimer:
All of the famous plagiarists featured in this webspace remain
“alleged plagiarists”, the documented allegations
having been made by others in the professional literature
and/or the popular media. Further details relating to these
allegations will be forthcoming in the book edition of Famous
Plagiarists. Although Dr. Lesko is a professor at Saginaw Valley State University, the Famous Plagiarists Research Project represents the individual research of John P. Lesko, plagiarologist, and SVSU accepts no responsibility for the content of these pages. Comments or questions should be directed to
|