Coulter
a Copy-and-Paster?
July
2006--As reported in the blogosphere and then in the tabloid-factoid
New
York Post, right wing columnist and book author Ann
Coulter has been accused of cribbing in her syndicated
columns as well as her most recent book, Godless. Universal
Press Syndicate investigated the plagiarism allegations and
concluded that "minimal matching text is not plagiarism"
stating also that "Universal Press Syndicate is confident
in the ability of Ms. Coulter, an attorney and frequent media
target, to know when to make attribution and when not to"
("Sorry harpies--syndicator sees no Coulter plagiarism",
Chicago Tribune); John Barrie of Turnitin.com sees
things differently--he claims to have found examples of "textbook
plagiarism" in Coulter's work.
Jobs
On the Line at Ohio University, Department of Mechanical Engineering
June
2006--As reported in the Columbus Dispatch, two professors
in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio University
are in the midst of a plagiarism controversy concerning the
theses written by graduate students over the past 20 years.
The committee investigating the alleged instances of plagiarism
in over 20 master's level theses has recommended that the
two professors be dismissed over the controversy ("Plagiarism
panel recommends firing two OU professors").
Churchill
Investigation Completed: Sanctions Yet to be Determined
May
2006--Dated May 9, the long-awaited "Report
of the Investigative Committee of the Standing Committee on
Research Misconduct at the University of Colorado at Boulder
concerning Allegations of Academic Misconduct against Professor
Ward Churchill" has finally been completed. The entire
125 page report (whew!) is available for download from the
University of Colorado website
along with other information about the investigation into
the research misconduct allegations against the infamous professor
of ethnic studies with dubious claims to American Indian ancestry.
The report details findings of serious and deliberate research
misconduct including fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism
as well as "Failure to comply with established standards
regarding author names on publications" and "Serious
deviation from accepted practices in reporting results from
research". Sanctions against Churchill have yet to be
determined with possibilities on the table inclusing outright
dismissal and revocation of tenure, or the less harsh suspension
without pay.
Harvard
Student's Sophomoric Composing Strategies
May 2006--The media has been all over Harvard sophomore Kaavya
Viswanathan and her book How Opal Mehta Got Kissed,
Got Wild and Got a Life (published by Little Brown).
Apparent plagiarism in Viswanathan's book has resulted in
the book's being pulped and the cancellation by Little Brown
of plans to publish the sequel to the Harvard author's derivative
debut novel. The Harvard Crimson first broke the
story with David Zhou's "Sophomore's
New Book Contains Passages Strikingly Similar to 2001 Novel."
Since these first plagiarism allegations were raised by the
Crimson concerning Viswanathan's "internalization"
(as the young author herself put it) of content and language
from Megan F. McCafferty's novels Sloppy Firsts (2001)
and Second Helpings (2003), other allegations have
been made that Viswanathan also appropriated from other authors.
These other sources of 'inspiration' for the Harvard sophomore
include "chick-lit" author Sophie Kinsella (Madeleine
Wickham), Salman Rushdie, and Meg Cabot (Holahan, C. "Teen
loses book deal"). Criticism of the book publisher,
Little Brown, and the book 'packager', 17th Street Productions/Alloy
Entertainment (a co-copyright holder with Viswanathan), has
portrayed the "young girl [as being] pushed by the needs
of a publishing machine and, no doubt, by her own ambition"
(Rushdie, S. qtd by J. Lessware in "Rushdie
enters row over yound author's 'plagiarism' "). And
it has also been observed that the "Kaavya Case [is]
Not [the] First Plagiarism Controversy for Opal Mehta Packager"
by Shane Wilson, writing for the Harvard Independent.
For specific similarities between McCafferty's and Viswanathan's
novels, these are posted online at publishersmarketplace.com
for those interested in verifying for themselves just how
closely the sophomoric composing of this novice author resembles
passages from Sloppy Firsts and Second Helpings.
Dan
Brown Wins Plagiarism Case
April 2006--As reported in The Independent, Da
Vinci Code author Dan Brown has prevailed in court against
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, authors of The Holy
Blood and the Holy Grail, which they claimed Brown had
plagiarized in developing his own book in this genre of religious
conspiracy theory. Forced to pay court costs by their loss,
Baigent and Leigh are now stuck with a hefty legal bill of
£2 million pounds! (Milmo, C. "Brown wins 'Da Vinci
Code' plagiarism battle").
Sting
Operation Disrupts University of Alberta Plagiarism Ring
April 2006--As reported in Excalibur
online, an undercover operation by a broadcast journalist
resulted in a sessional instructor being caught in the act
of "accepting money from students in exchange for papers."
The journalist posed as a college student and approached instructor
Peter Cloven with the undercover proposition to write a college
paper in exchange for money. Surprise, surprise! Cloven found
himself on camera in the student union, and after the sting
operation was aired on CTV news, Kloven was banned from campus,
although he apparently managed to get several more individual
"tutoring" sessions in ahead of the ban (Larocque,
M. "Plagiarism ring busted at U of A: Professor caught
selling papers to students").
President
Putin a Plagiarist? Or Purchaser of a Shoddy Dissertation?
April 2006--The Washington Times, The Moscow
Times, The Pittsburgh Tribune Review and other
sources have been reporting on the startling discovery of
plagiarism in a doctoral thesis *written* by none other than
the President of Russia, Vladimir Putin. Putin's 1997 thesis
"Strategic Planning of the Reproduction of the Resource
Base", for which he received a PhD (equivalent "candidate
of science" degree) from the St. Petersburg Mining Institute,
allegedly copies language and diagrams from a "1978 book
'Strategic Planning and Policy' by University of Pittsburgh
professors William King and David Cleland" ("Putin
Accused of Plagairizing Thesis" The Moscow Times).
While some theorize that Putin himself lifted the material
from King and Cleland's book, others suspect that the Russian
President may have paid someone to write his dissertation
for him, evidently a very shoddy piece of work for his money:
"poorly organized . . . poorly written . . . poorly researched,
second rate" in the words of Clifford Gaddy, the Brookings
Institute scholar who discovered the plagiary after noticing
the disjointed style of Putin's PhD thesis ("Russia:
U.S. Academics Charge Putin With Plagiarizing Thesis").
Argosy
University-Chicago Fires Thesis Plagiarist
March 2006--The next step in the Argosy University plagiarism
saga has been the firing of thesis plagiarist Bindu Ganga
(Newbart, D."University
fires official accused of plagiarism."
Chicago Sun-Times). Ganga is evidently considering
legal action against the university who had previously defended
their plagiarist-in-residence. But when the Sun-Times
broke the story (see below) of how a student was disciplined
for raising the plagiarism allegations in the first place
against Ganga, it didn't take too long for Argosy Uni to realize
their mistake and sever connections with this egregious offender.
Shooting
the Messenger: Argosy
University-Chicago Disciplines Student Over Professorial
Plagiarism
February 2006--The Chicago Sun-Times reports on the case of
a "Student [being] scolded over plagiarism
allegation", an allegation directed against a member
of Argosy University's
faculty. As Dave Newbart reports, after the student made allegations
against Bindu Ganga, "confid[ing] to a professor that
she believed Ganga's thesis might have been plagiarized",
she was accused of ethics violations involving "a pattern
of unprofessional comportment . . . including disrespect toward
those in authority" ! Student Marla Decker did end up
receiving her degree, but her 'ethics violations' ended up
as a "part of her permanent academic record"! Talk
about a sorry response to plagiarism accusations on the part
Argosy University officials! It gets even worse. The title
of Ganga's doctoral thesis? Deception vs. Perception,
from which Ganga later published a paper leading to the
plagiarism allegations. That paper was entitled "Deception
vs. perception: A critical look at the intricacies of lying
within the therapeutic relationship" and it borrows heavily
from Charles Ford's book Lies! Lies!! Lies!!! as
was determined by a Turnitin.com
"originality report".
Plagiarologists
and Ongoing Research in Plagiarology
February 2006--Dr. J.P. Lesko, applied linguist and plagiarologist,
has coined several new terms to define the important research
being conducted by many scholars relating to the modern plagiarism
phenomenon.
Plagiarology:
The study of plagiary.
A new field of study (with reference to the modern plagiarism
phenomenon) which results from an apparent increase in the
various forms of plagiarism, derivation, mimicry, fabrication,
fraud and related behaviors.
Plagiarologist:
A specialist in plagiarology; one who studies plagiary
and related forms of derivation, mimicry, fabrication, fraud,
etc.
For
further info, refer to www.plagiarology.info
Debut
of Plagiary
Covered in NYT and Inside
Higher Ed
February 2006--The debut of the new scholarly journal Plagiary
was recently covered by Scott McLemee of Inside Higher
Ed as well as Sara Ivry writing for the New York
Times. Read Scott's article "Stolen Words"
here,
and Sara's article "Plagiarists Exposed, Then Explored"
here.
Artist's
Playground - (or Plagiarism?): Aspects
of Copying In Contemporary Culture
Tuesday, 31 January
2006, 10.30am – 5.30pm
Lecture Theatre One, Royal College of Art, London, SW7 2EU
Copying can be
essential for an artist’s practice and many artists
developed their individual style by looking at, translating
and sampling other people’s work. But how far can
you go? How similar is similar? And what happens to artists
who tread close to the line. What is the difference between
parody and plagiarism?
The Association of Illustrators has brought together experts
in their disciplines to discuss the many aspects of copying
in their specific fields.
Speakers
include:
Robert Lands, Lawyer,
specialising in intellectual property law, Finers Stephens
Innocent - case studies
Prof. Dr. Ursula
Link-Heer, Professor of Latin Literature, Bergische Universitaet
Wuppertal, Germany – a short history of the term 'Style'
in literature – parody or plagiarism?
Karsten Schubert,
Curator and Art Dealer – about copying as common practice
in the history of art from the middle ages to Picasso and
its meaning/context
Patricia Bickers,
Editor, Art Monthly – about contemporary practice
of copying in the 20th/21st century from Ready Made to Appropriation
Art
Simon Stern, Illustrator
and author of ‘Rights – The Illustrators Guide
to Professional Practice’: the commercial artist’s
perspective
Paul Gerhardt,
Director of BBC Creative Archive, The provider’s perspective
Please Book in
Advance:
Tickets: £35 AOI members, £55 non-members, £30
students (please send proof of status), 10% discount on
group bookings of 6 or more.
Please send a cheque made payable to the Association of
Illustrators to AOI, 2nd floor, Back Building, 150 Curtain
Road, London EC2A 3AR or telephone 020 7324 7222 to book
with Visa/MasterCard or Solo/Switch (Maestro) . . .
. . . or book online
at the AOI website
Plagiarism
Likely to Remain a "Big Media Issue"
January 2006--In an article at www.courant.come entitled "Plagiarism,
Payola, Profits And Other Big Media Issues", Paul
Janensch speculates that plagiarism is likely to remain an
important issue: "More newsroom plagiarists will be found
out and let go." This speculation has already been substantiated
by the resignation of Michal
Olesker from the Baltimore Sun at the very start
of 2006, just several weeks shy of his 30 year anniversary
with the paper. Gadi Dechter, a reporter with the Baltimore
City Paper, discovered the apparent plagiarism after
reviewing columns written by Olesker, and these allegations
followed complaints by the Maryland Governor's office staff
that Olesker had been reporting on events that he had actually
not attended. So far, not a good start to 2006. Some New Year's
Resolutions appear to be in order.
Editor to newsroom staff: "Uncross those fingers
behind your back while repeating after me:
"Throughout the entire year of 2006, I will not plagiarize.
I will not fabricate or engage in 'drive-by journalism'. I
will not report on major news events as if I were on scene,
when I was actually somewhere else. I will properly acknowledge
the re-use of text/words, particularly articles which have
appeared in the print runs of our competitors".
New
Journal On Educational Integrity Founded
December 2005--The new International
Journal for Educational Integrity has been founded by
Helen Marsden and Tracey Bretag. The founding of this new
journal comes at an opportune moment for Australian educators
who have had to grapple with widespread occurrences of plagiarism
along with allegations of failed cover-ups and "hush-hush"
campaigns to keep the serious nature of the problem from affecting
their "lucrative overseas [students] program" (Cohen,
D. "Australian Scholars, Beset With Plagiarism, Inaugurate
New Journal on Academic Integrity").
Defending Vice Against "Attack-Dog" Journalism
December 2005--Story South's Jason Sanford has risen
to defend Vice, MSU's Brad Vice,
the Missippi State University professor who has recently come
under much criticism for alleged plagiarism. The MSU prof
is alleged to have lifted Carl Carmer's verbatim description
of a Ku Klux Klan rally for use in a prize-winning book The
Bear Bryant Funeral Train. After a New York Press
article by Robert Clark Young made even further allegations
against Vice in "A
Charming Plagiarist: The Downfall of Brad Vice",
counter-allegations were quick to be made against Young in
Jason Sanford's "New
attack on Brad Vice is merely poor journalism". Coming
to the defense of Vice, Sanford alleges that Young's
"attack-dog article on Brad Vice’s supposed plagiarism
. . . in a poorly regarded weekly newspaper [New York
Press]" contains altered quotations to make the
plagiarism charges against Vice seem more serious than they
would be otherwise. Sanford and other writers have also suggested
that Young might have an axe to grind with regard to the Sewanee
Writers Conference, and that he used the Vice plagiarism
allegations to settle a literary score. Easy way to avoid
such score-settling and "Attack-Dog" journalism:
quotation marks and advance notice of verbatim *intertextuality*.
Chris Elliott Kidnaps Boilerplate, Falls for Online Spoof
November 2005--As reported in "The Strange Case of the
Spoofer Captured by a Spoof" (E. Wyatt, New
York Times), actor and author Chris
Elliott fell for an online joke and has had to reckon
with the creator of Boilerplate, a 19th century robot who
never really existed in the first place except in the imaginative
creations of Paul Guinan. The fictitious robot appears in
Elliott's just released parody-murder-mystery-sci-fi novel
The Shroud of the Thwacker, a novel intended to be
a spoof of historical figures such as Teddy Roosevelt, Yoko
Ono . . . and Boilerplate. Only trouble is, Boilerplate
isn't historical. He was never invented by Professor Archibald
Campion for exhibit at the 1893 World's Fair in Chicago (as
claimed at bigredhair.com).
Rather, Boilerplate is an invention of the postmodern imagination,
"a postmodern, post-dated parody of a hoax" (E.
Wyatt) who features in Guinan's comic/graphic novel Heartbreakers
Meet Boilerplate.
Plagiarism? The word has been mentioned. But this case
of the kidnapped robot that never was seems more like
a relatively minor instance of copyright infringement (already
settled out of court before the scandal even broke) with a
possible whiff of gimmickry and sales-mongering (here's your
cut, this'll be mine). Both authors, Elliott and Guinan, are
set to profit off of this "scandal" which has suspiciously
broken right about the time that any new book could use a
good sales boost--Heartbreakers Meet Boilerplate was
released in July, The Shroud of the Thwacker in October.

Professor
J.P. Lesko discussing "The
Case of the Kidnapped Robot that Never Was" on CNBC
TV. November 1, 2005
British
Psychiatrist Pilfers American Scholar's Work
November 2005--Several media outlets have carried the breaking
plagiarism story involving well known mental health expert
Dr. Raj Persaud.
In February of 2005, the article in question, "Why the
Media Refuses to Obey", appeared in the journal Progress
in Neurology and Psychiatry. As was subsequently discovered
by American professor (University of Maryland) Thomas Blass,
Dr. Persaud had appropriated about fifty percent of the article
content from Blass's work--allegedly the second time
that Persaud has pilfered content from the same author without
acknowledgement! Persaud's article was retracted by Wiley
Interface Ltd., the journal publisher, and Persaud himself
attributed the alleged plagiarism to an inadvertent omission:
"I am happy to apologise for the error, which occurred
whereby when I cut and pasted the original copy, the references
at the end were inadvertently omitted." Virtually the
same excuse Persaud used the first time in blaming the unacknowledged
derivation on "subeditors" who for some reason removed
the citations(Pidd, H. "'He took paragraphs from my work,
word for word' - psychiatrist faces plagiarism charge."
The Guardian).
Brown
Legally Cleared of Plagiarism Charges (for the time being)
August
2005--The BBC News reports that Da Vinci Code author
Dan Brown was cleared in a New York court of plagiarism allegations
made by Lewis Perdue. Perdue will evidently appeal this decision
by Judge George Daniels, so this case may not be over just
yet. According to Judge Daniels, Brown's Da Vinci Code
contained "unprotectable ideas", and Brown's use
of such ideas did not constitute an infringement on the authorship
rights of Perdue with regard to his books Daughter of
God and The Da Vinci Legacy. This ruling by
Judge Daniels contrasts sharply with a previous analysis conducted
by The Forensic Linguistics Institute which found that "evidence
of infringement is overwhelming" (http://www.davincilegacy.com).
There is clear historical precedent
for would-be authors being legally cleared of plagiarism in
a court of law while being adjudged guilty by modern scholarship.
So while Dan Brown may be off the hook for now, the appeal
by Perdue as well as further analyses of Brown's modes of
textual composition will be important in determining the final
verdict in this case ("Author Brown 'did not plagiarise'",
BBC News).
$1.92 Million Legal Bill in Judicial Plagiarism Case
July
2005--Did a Flordia judge crib a paper back in his days as
an Air Force reservist, or is he a victim of an attempted
frame-up as retaliation for his role in rooting out courthouse
corruption? The
Empire Journal reported on the ongoing plagiarism saga
of Florida Judge Gregory Holder. After being cleared by a
judicial panel (Judicial Qualification Commission, Fla.)of
plagiarizing a research paper written in his college days
at MacDill Air Force Base, Judge Holder submitted a legal
bill with a grand total of $1.92 million dollars! Although
he has apparently been cleared of the plagiarism charges,
the legal bills accrued are simply astounding. All because
of an allegation of plagiarism going back to Holder's college
days at MacDill Air Force Base. Nearly $2 million! That's
a lot of $$$, which means the State of Florida will likely
have to fork over the cash since the yearly budget of the
Judicial Qualification Commission falls short at only $800,000.
U. of Missouri Dean Underestimates the Power of Google
June
2005--A Google search by Sally Greene has uncovered plagiary
in a commencement address delivered by Bryan LeBeau in
2003 at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. He should
have known better. Now the widely known Professor of History
and Dean of the University of Missouri's College of Arts and
Sciences probably wishes he had never published that address
online in his "Dean's Newsletter". Greene's Googling
revealed that LeBeau had lifted portions of his speech from
an earlier address delivered by distinguished Princeton University
professor, Cornel West. This seems to be a clear case of oral
plagiarism, quite an irony considering LeBeau's moonlighting
as host for "Talking History" [emphasis
added], a nationally syndicated radio program of the Organization
of American Historians carried on National Public Radio every
week.
Plagiarism Allegations in the Blogosphere: The Case of Rashid
Khalidi
June
2005--In a quickly convened "trial by blog" (solomonia.com;
FrontPageMagazine.com;
hnn.us),
Columbia University's Edward Said Chair of Arab Studies has
been accused of plagiarizing in an Internet article on the
history of Jerusalem posted on the website of the American
Committe of Jerusalem (re-named as the American Taskforce
on Palestine). As reported by bloggers and historians, Professor
Khalid Rashidi seems to have lifted material for re-use from
a previous article by Kamil Jamil el Asali, formerly of the
University of Jordan. Dean Austin Quigley of Columbia seemed
to suggest that the plagiarism allegations were of "malicious"
intent. Khalidi's outspoken, anti-Israeli rhetoric has certainly
engendered a degree of opposition from students and pro-Israel
activists, and this rhetoric seems to have inspired an analysis
of his scholarship something akin to the analyses of Ward
Churchill's record,a close evaluation of the notorious
claims and dubious ancestry of the "9-11 Prof".
Curiously, the American Committee on Jerusalem has removed
the Rashid Khalidi byline, replacing it with "Compiled
by ACJ from a variety of sources." This textual retreat
by both ACJ and Khalidi from the article "Jerusalem,
A Concise History", would seem to be a tacit admission
that the plagiarism allegations are valid, oppositional origins
of the allegations notwithstanding.
Tactical Interlingual Plagiarism: Brazilian National Football
Coach Lifts Outdated English Soccer Manual
June
2005--In "Brazil's Coach in Plagiarism Row" (Steve
Kingstone), Zee News and BBC News report that Brazilian national
football [soccer] coach Carlos
Alberto Parreira has allegedly lifted sections of an English
Football Association manual on Tactics and Teamwork
(by Charles Hughes in 1973) for use in his book Tactical
Evolution and Strategies of the Game. Parreira's work
contains now dated material which has evidently been translated
directly into Portuguese from the English version by Hughes.
Although his name appears on the book, Parreira denies that
it was his decision to publish the book, but he does admit
having translated coaching materials and passing these on
the the Brazilian School of Football (http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4608743.stm).
Plagiarism Detection For Scholarly
Publishers
May
2005--The realization that students aren't the only ones plagiarizing
means that scholars are going to have their work submitted
for originality checks as part of the manuscript submission
and review process in scholarly publishing. Scott Carlson
reports in the Chronicle that specialized software
is being tested for use by journal editors and publishers
to help guarantee the integrity and originality of the published
scholarly discourse ("Journal Publishers Turn to Software
to Root Out Scholarly Plagiarism"). Christian Collberg
and colleagues reported on the progress made in detecting
the level of "self-plagiarism" in the scholarly
literature based on how much text authors might re-use again
and again in identical or very similar articles as a means
of inflating or padding their publishing record. Such a "bloated"
state of the scholarly discourse, "cluttered with papers
on the same topics, but with different names", is a serious
issue which such new detection initiatives should help to
reduce in the years ahead (Collberg et al. "A Study of
Self-Plagiarism in Computer Science." See http://splat.cs.arizona.edu/).
Plagiary--A New Scholarly Journal Devoted to Cross-Disciplinary
Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification
May
2005--Plagiary:
Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and
Falsification is a new scholarly journal devoted
to investigating plagiary and fraud-related phenomena across
disciplines of inquiry. It is scheduled for launching in January
of 2006. The web domain for this new journal has been reserved
at www.plagiary.org
(now online). Papers are solicited for this new journal in
the following areas related to plagiarism, fabrication, and
falsification:
- Discipline specific
misconduct (i.e. journalism, history, science, etc.)
- Historical instances
and views
- Development of
modern conventions for referencing and source acknowledgement
- Popular genres
of discourse
- Legal issues (i.e.
copyright infringement, federal regulations)
- Case studies (modern
or historical; inter-/intra-lingual)
- Plagiarism/fraud
detection and prevention
- Pedagogical approaches
and student perspectives at the university level
- Technical reports
on related phenomena (i.e. cryptomnesia)
- Correlations of
plagiary with other forms of fraudulent behavior and scholarly
misconduct
- Other topics of
clear relevance to the study of plagiary/fabrication/falsification
- Book reviews
- Responses to published
articles
Potential contributors
with a scholarly interest in plagiarism are encouraged to
submit manuscripts of high quality in any of the areas above
to the Editor of Plagiary, Dr.
John P. Lesko for publications consideration (more
info about publishing in Plagiary).
Press Secretary for New Mexico Congressman Steve Pearce Resigns
after Plagiarism
May
2005--The Press Secretary for New Mexico Republican Congressman
Steve Pearce resigned after plagiarizing an opinion column
submitted to El Defensor Chieftain in Pearce's name.
Jim Burns lifted text "word-for-word" from the website
of the Heritage Foundation, and he admitted "It was a
colossal error in judgment. Rather than stay on and embarrass
the congressman, I am leaving"(M. Coleman, Albuquerque
Journal).
Latest Biography On e.e. Cummings Relies Too Much on Work
of Predecessor: 'This is Plagiarism'
May
2005--A Harper's Magazine review by Wyatt Mason doesn't
look good for the reputation of MIT Writer-in-Residence Christopher
Sawyer-Lauçanno. His recently released e.e.
cummings, A Biography was praised by other reviewers.
Not by Mason. "This is plagiarism", he says after
closely analyzing the new book's scholarly merits and concluding
that Sawyer-Lauçanno has not sufficiently acknowledged
his debt to a previous biographer, Richard S. Kennedy, author
of Dreams in the Mirror: A Biography of e.e. cummings.
First Scientist to be Barred for Life from Federal Funding
April
2005--The Scientist (www.the-scientist.com)reports
that Eric Poehlman is the "first researcher barred for
life from seeking federal funding." Prior to this ban,
Poehlman was an acknowledged obesity expert, also studying
aging and menopause. But after being found out for falsifying
and fabricating data on as many as 17 grant applications,
thanks to the suspicions of Poehlman's research assistant,
Walter F. DeNino, an investigation by the University of Vermont
exposed the serious fraud being engaged in by Poehlman in
his government funded research projects. According to the
federal Office of Research Integrity, this was one of the
most serious cases of such fraud in 20 years (S. Smallwood,
"Former Scientist at U. of Vermont to Plead Guilty to
Vast Research Fraud).
College Plagiarism Comes Back to Haunt Bolton Critic Melody
Townsel
April
2005--Melody Townsel, Anti-Bush activist and former head of
"Mothers Opposing Bush",
has had her credibility questioned after plagiarism from her
college-days re-surfaced. Townsel gained a brief bit of notoriety
for her accusations against John Bolton, President Bush's
nominee for Ambassador to the UN.
Townsel
had accused Bolton of "acting like a madman" and
harassing her in a Russian hotel as part of the Democratic
strategy to derail Bolton's nomination to the UN.
In
a published letter, Townsel apologized for plagiarizing several
columns in a college newspaper nearly twenty years ago:
Tonight,
my deepest fears regarding my pending testimony in the John
Bolton nomination process have come true: Republicans have
dredged up un unfortunate chapter of my life and, clearly,
are about to announce it to the world . . . When I was in
college, 22 years ago, I plagiarized some columns while
working for my college newspaper, and I was removed from
staff . . . As you can imagine, I'm deeply ashamed to be
forced to revisit these events so publicly -- and, while
I was under tremendous academic, financial and family pressure
at the time, there is absolutely NO excuse for what I did
so long ago. I knew it was wrong then, and I remain deeply
ashamed and embarrassed. . . . As you judge me, please keep
in mind that I was 21 years old when this happened. Today,
at 42, I can state emphatically that I've worked hard my
entire professional and personal life to put my incredibly
poor decisions and actions behind me . . . (Melody Townsel)
Questions of political
affiliation aside, this incident demonstrates that an accusation
of plagiarism is quite a potent weapon in ongoing controversies
and political debate, influencing opinion in areas ranging
from US presidential elections (i.e. the Joe
Biden incident) to presidential appointments.
MIT
Students Develop Paper-Writing Computer Program
April
2005--CNN reported that three graduate students at MIT developed
a computer program which "writes" papers by randomly
generating sentences extracted from real papers, and substituting
appropriate "buzzwords".
The
resulting paper which Jeremy Stribling, Max Krohn and Dan
Aguayo successfully submitted to an academic conference was
a "gobbledygook" compilation of nonsensical phrases
and jargon resembling the prose found in many academic publications.
The
four page paper was entitled "Rooter: A Methodology for
the Typical Unification of Access Points and Redundancy",
and it was accepted by the Ninth World Multi-Conference
on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. The beginning
of this randomly generated paper reads as follows:
Many
physicists would agree that, had it not been for
congestion control, the evaluation of web browsers might
never
have occurred. In fact, few hackers worldwide would disagree
with the essential unification of voice-over-IP and publicprivate
key pair. In order to solve this riddle, we confirm that
SMPs can be made stochastic, cacheable, and interposable.
[entire
paper available in PDF format at http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/rooter.pdf].
Plagiarists
employ such derivative, synonym-substitution techniques on
a regular basis, and as these bright MIT students have demonstrated,
the professional discourse genres remain susceptible to worthless
contributions such as plagiarized research, or in this case,
grad student pranks.
Harvard
Professors: Words Aren't the Only Thing to Steal!
April
2005--What's with Harvard Profs and their thefts these days?!?!
After some fairly high profile cases of plagiarism involving
the theft of words by some notable Harvard professors (i.e.
Lawrence Tribe
and Charles J. Ogletree,
Jr.), another sort of thievery has emerged.
Piper
Fogg of The Chronicle of Higher Education reports
that Harvard Professor of Economics, Dr. Martin L. Weitzman,
was arrested in early April for
attempting
to steal manure last Friday from a horse farm in Rockport,
30 miles northeast of Boston . . . the stable manager at
the farm of Charles Lane, found the economist on the property
on Friday and blocked the professor's pickup truck before
telephoning the police.
Professors
at Ivy League institutions stealing chunks of text, and now
chunks of something else--horse manure!
Something
is not quite right in American institutions of higher learning
today.
"9-11
Prof" Update: Further Plagiarism by Ward Churchill Uncovered
March
2005--As the investigation of "9-11 Prof" Ward Churchill
continues, further allegations of plagiarism have surfaced.
This new allegation concerns Churchill's plagiarism of an
article by Dalhousie University Professer Fay G. Cohen.
After
Cohen complained in 1997 about the misuse of her article by
Colorado University's Ward Churchill, she received a chilling
phone message late one night, apparently from Churchill himself:
"I'll get you for this!"
Cohen
subsequently dropped all complaints for fear of her personal
safety, and the matter has only resurfaced in 2005 due to
the controversy surrounding the 9-11 Prof's scholarly record
and outrageous remarks pertaining to the victims of 9-11.
Concern
Grows Among Educators Over Negative Effects of Turnitin.com
Plagiarism Detection Services
March
2005--Posting from an online forum on plagiarism at the Chronicle
of Higher Education (plagiarism
forum link).
Actually, turnitin.com
has a LOT of problems, and I'd caution colleagues to think
carefully about using it. Here is my list:
A. It does not
catch all kinds of cheating, so gives faculty a false sense
of security:
1) the software finds "matches" but not lots of
other kinds of cheating (such as putting in false citations,
improper paraphrasing, making up information, etc.).
2) it does not check any proprietary databases except those
owned by ProQuest, so copying from other databases is not
caught.
3) it does not catch any copying from non-digital sources.
4) it finds all matching texts, including appropriately
cited quotations and similar bibliographic citations. As
a result, instructors spend a lot of time scanning papers
for false positives.
5) it only displays the match from the item most recently
added to the database. That means that if a student essay
submitted from college A contains a quotation from a published
article, the software displays the student paper A as the
match to your student's paper, not the original source.
B. It fosters a "culture of suspicion" on campus
and encourages faculty themselves to "cheat" by
using it rather than putting in the work to teach good writing.
I'll quote a colleague of mine anonymously, as she does
not know I am copying from her message:
"Writing is a complex cultural process. The act of
"incorporating
sources" involves understanding the conventions associated
with
particular kinds of writing (e.g., a lab report or an
analytic essay), one or more academic disciplines (e.g.,
history and/or biology), and a citational system (e.g.,
APA or MLA). It also involves careful analysis of audience
expectations and a series of rhetorical choices which,
through experience, the writer must learn to make consciously
and to control in order to be considered proficient. [...]
we strongly object to the use of Turnitin.com as a pedagogical
tool for this work. Turnitin and services like it undermine
the learning that must take place in order for students
to become proficient writers by framing writing as something
that can be machine-scanned and machine-compared to a
database of other work. This, in turn, ultimately may
lead instructors to abdicate responsibility for teaching
writing [...] and instead rely on this service as support.
"
9-11
Prof an Alleged Plagiarist
Feb.
2005--WorldNetDaily.com reports that the controversial "9-11
Prof" Ward Churchill
is a plagiarist. Known for his outspoken comments which compared
9-11 victims to Nazi war criminals, Ward Churchill has also
come under fire for alleged plagiarism and sloppy scholarship.
These allegations actually date to 1999, but they have resurfaced
due to the controversy surrounding Churchill's 9-ll remarks.
Walmart
Heiress Plagiarized Her Way Through College
Dec.
2004--The Associated Press reported in December 2004
that Wal-Mart heiress Elizabeth
Paige Laurie had allegedly paid as much as $20,000 dollars
to rommate Elena Martinez to write her papers for her. Martinez
gave an interview on ABC's 20/20 in which she described
the alleged "Research Services" which she provided
to Ms. Paige Laurie. As a result of this alleged plagiarism--claiming
to have written papers which her roommate actually wrote--the
University of Southern California has launched an investigation,
says the Vice-President of Student Affairs, Michael Jackson.
Da
Vinci Code
Possibly Plagiarized
Oct.
2004--Dan Brown may have
plagiarized the work of another author in writing the spectacularly
popular Da Vinci Code reports The Telegraph.
If the plagiarism charges are substantiated, author Lewis
Purdue and others may be set to claim a tidy sum from the
millions of dollars in sales revenue generated by this wildly
successful work of pop-fiction.
Nagasaki
Schoolgirl Murder Related to Plagiarism
Aug.
2004--The Mainichi Daily News posted a story on a schoolgirl
murder case related to a dispute concerning plagiarism in
a circular diary maintained by students. In this diary, students
wrote entries back and forth to each other. The 12 year old
schoolgirl killer had complained in one of her entries, "Don't
plagiarize my expression". She had also "warned
other members in another diary not to imitate her illustrations,
suggesting she has a particular attachment to her originality".
The plagiarism issue seemed to have gone away, reported the
Daily News, yet after some further insults exchanged among
the schoolgirls, one of them was slashed and murdered in a
retaliatory incident that shocked all of Japan. What is particularly
shocking about this case is how a 12 year old girl could murder
a classmate over such petty, online insults. These online
insults--including apparent instances of plagiarism--escalated
into a case of schoolyard murder!
Madonna
and "Hollywood Plagiarism"
May
2004--Thomas Crosbie Media reported that Madonna
was required to pay $638,000 to French photographer Guy Bourdin
after plagiarizing his work for a music video. Court action
is also pending against the video director and Warner Brothers
according to this report. Although Guy Bourdin is now deceased,
this has not prevented the return of another author to reclaim
the rights to his work!
Student
Plagiarist Sues for Damages
May
2004--A BBC News article reported that university student
Michael Gunn has sued the University of Kent as Canturbury
for not providing sufficient warning about plagiarism! Gunn
admitted plagiarizing in his university level work, but felt
that he should have been warned earlier in his course of study
than just before the final exams.
"Turn
it in? Throw it out!": College Students Protest Against
Turnitin Plagiarism
Detection
Mar.
2004--In a protest against the use of Turnitin.com
and plagiarism detection in general, college students at McGill
University outlined their arguments against professors' use
of cheat detection technology. According to the McGill
Tribune, students thought that plagiarism detection was
unfair because it basically accuses them of plagiarism before
running a plagiarism check--in effect, guilty until proven
innocent.
Students
also objected to fattening the profits of the California based
corporation iParidigms, of which Turnitin is a subsidiary.
Other students observed that the use of cheat detection technology
erodes the trust between professors and their students: "It
creates a considerable climate of distrust" said student
Nick Peters. Protesters held up signs reading "My degree
is not guilty" and "Turn it in? Throw it out!"
A
blogger commenting on this protest against Turnitin observed
that "An instructor who uses this check as part of his
process, instead of only for suspicious papers, is admitting
to not knowing anything about the student's abilities and
attitude. Not good."
Colleges
Noting "XF" Grade on Plagiarists' Transcripts
Dec.2003--Community
College Week reported that Barton County Community College
in Kansas gave a student a grade of "XF" for plagiarizing
a paper. The plagiarism was discovered after an Internet search,
and this report mentioned that other colleges and universities
have also been entering this grade of "XF" in transcripts
for cases of cheating and plagiarism.
Harry
Potter Author Sues Tanya Grotter Author
Mar.
2003--J.K. Rowling and her publisher have sued the author
of The Magic Double Bass with a heroine by the name
of Tanya Grotter. Rowling claims that Dmitry Yemets' work
infringes the copyright of her work Harry Potter,
but Yemets claimes that his work is a parody or satire of
Harry Potter: "Like with all parodies, there
are common elements, but this is a literary satire".
Harry
Potter Author Wins Plagiarism Case
Sept.
2002--The BBC news reported that J.K.Rowling
had won a plagiarism case filed by a US writer claiming that
her work had been plagiarized by the author of the Harry
Potter series. The judge in the case determined that
the accuser, Nancy Stouffer, had manipulated the textual evidence
to support her claims, and he fined her $30,000 for a "pattern
of intentional bad faith conduct".
| 
Found
something useful at this site? Want to see the
public naming/databasing of plagiarists continue?
Please consider dropping a bit of spare change
in the hat via secure PayPal in support of the
Famous Plagiarists Research Project (web hosting,
database management, ongoing research).
|
back
to top
Disclaimer:
All of the famous plagiarists featured in this webspace remain
“alleged plagiarists”, the documented allegations
having been made by others in the professional literature
and/or the popular media. Further details relating to these
allegations will be forthcoming in the book edition of Famous
Plagiarists. Although Dr. Lesko is a professor at Saginaw
Valley State University, the Famous Plagiarists Research Project
represents the individual research of John P. Lesko, plagiarologist,
and SVSU accepts no responsibility for the content of these
pages. Comments or questions should be directed to

|